mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ML-based identification of the interface regions for coupling local and nonlocal models

arXiv 2404.15388 ↗First posted 23 Apr 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Local-nonlocal coupling approaches combine the computational efficiency of local models and the accuracy of nonlocal models. However, the coupling process is challenging, requiring expertise to identify the interface between local and nonlocal regions. This study introduces a machine learning-based approach to automatically detect the regions in which the local and nonlocal models should be used in a coupling approach. This identification process uses the loading functions and provides as output the selected model at the grid points. Training is based on datasets of loading functions for which reference coupling configurations are computed using accurate coupled solutions, where accuracy is measured in terms of the relative error between the solution to the coupling approach and the solution to the nonlocal model. We study two approaches that differ from one another in terms of the data structure. The first approach, referred to as the full-domain input data approach, inputs the full load vector and outputs a full label vector. In this case, the classification process is carried out globally. The second approach consists of a window-based approach, where loads are preprocessed and partitioned into windows and the problem is formulated as a node-wise classification approach in which the central point of each window is treated individually. The classification problems are solved via deep learning algorithms based on convolutional neural networks. The performance of these approaches is studied on one-dimensional numerical examples using F1-scores and accuracy metrics. In particular, it is shown that the windowing approach provides promising results, achieving an accuracy of 0.96 and an F1-score of 0.97. These results underscore the potential of the approach to automate coupling processes, leading to more accurate and computationally efficient solutions for material science applications.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Apr 2024.

Builds on

14 of 56 references.

References · 14

  1. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,919
  2. 2018Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,576
  3. 2020A Survey of Convolutional Neural Networks: Analysis, Applications, and Prospectscited by 397
  4. 2015Recent Advances in Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 360
  5. 2018Model Evaluation, Model Selection, and Algorithm Selection in Machine Learningcited by 157
  6. 2020A nonlocal physics-informed deep learning framework using the peridynamic differential operatorcited by 21
  7. 2021A data-driven peridynamic continuum model for upscaling molecular dynamicscited by 17
  8. 2020Data-driven learning of nonlocal models: from high-fidelity simulations to constitutive lawscited by 13
  9. 2021What machine learning can do for computational solid mechanicscited by 12
  10. 2023GNN-based physics solver for time-independent PDEscited by 11
  11. 2018Nonlocal Neural Networks, Nonlocal Diffusion and Nonlocal Modelingcited by 10
  12. 2019Bilevel parameter learning for nonlocal image denoising modelscited by 2
2 more
  1. 2020On the treatment of boundary conditions for bond-based peridynamic modelscited by 1
  2. 2022Coupling approaches for classical linear elasticity and bond-based peridynamic modelscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.