Multi-Modal Prompt Learning on Blind Image Quality Assessment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Image Quality Assessment (IQA) models benefit significantly from semantic information, which allows them to treat different types of objects distinctly. Currently, leveraging semantic information to enhance IQA is a crucial research direction. Traditional methods, hindered by a lack of sufficiently annotated data, have employed the CLIP image-text pretraining model as their backbone to gain semantic awareness. However, the generalist nature of these pre-trained Vision-Language (VL) models often renders them suboptimal for IQA-specific tasks. Recent approaches have attempted to address this mismatch using prompt technology, but these solutions have shortcomings. Existing prompt-based VL models overly focus on incremental semantic information from text, neglecting the rich insights available from visual data analysis. This imbalance limits their performance improvements in IQA tasks. This paper introduces an innovative multi-modal prompt-based methodology for IQA. Our approach employs carefully crafted prompts that synergistically mine incremental semantic information from both visual and linguistic data. Specifically, in the visual branch, we introduce a multi-layer prompt structure to enhance the VL model's adaptability. In the text branch, we deploy a dual-prompt scheme that steers the model to recognize and differentiate between scene category and distortion type, thereby refining the model's capacity to assess image quality. Our experimental findings underscore the effectiveness of our method over existing Blind Image Quality Assessment (BIQA) approaches. Notably, it demonstrates competitive performance across various datasets. Our method achieves Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient (SRCC) values of 0.961(surpassing 0.946 in CSIQ) and 0.941 (exceeding 0.930 in KADID), illustrating its robustness and accuracy in diverse contexts.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Apr 2024.
Builds on
14 of 28 references.
References · 14
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2021MUSIQ: Multi-scale Image Quality Transformercited by 1,058
- 2022Exploring CLIP for Assessing the Look and Feel of Imagescited by 974
- 2019KonIQ-10k: An ecologically valid database for deep learning of blind image quality assessmentcited by 351
- 2019Blind Image Quality Assessment Using A Deep Bilinear Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 301
- 2023Blind Image Quality Assessment via Vision-Language Correspondence: A Multitask Learning Perspectivecited by 276
- 2015Massive Online Crowdsourced Study of Subjective and Objective Picture Qualitycited by 208
- 2021No-Reference Image Quality Assessment via Transformers, Relative Ranking, and Self-Consistencycited by 165
- 2020MetaIQA: Deep Meta-learning for No-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 144
- 2020Uncertainty-Aware Blind Image Quality Assessment in the Laboratory and Wildcited by 134
2 more
- 2020Transformer for Image Quality Assessmentcited by 76
- 2023Data-Efficient Image Quality Assessment with Attention-Panel Decodercited by 49
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.