mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Latency-Distortion Tradeoffs in Communicating Classification Results over Noisy Channels

arXiv 2404.14586 ↗First posted 22 Apr 2024cs.IT cs.LG cs.NIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this work, the problem of communicating decisions of a classifier over a noisy channel is considered. With machine learning based models being used in variety of time-sensitive applications, transmission of these decisions in a reliable and timely manner is of significant importance. To this end, we study the scenario where a probability vector (representing the decisions of a classifier) at the transmitter, needs to be transmitted over a noisy channel. Assuming that the distortion between the original probability vector and the reconstructed one at the receiver is measured via f-divergence, we study the trade-off between transmission latency and the distortion. We completely analyze this trade-off using uniform, lattice, and sparse lattice-based quantization techniques to encode the probability vector by first characterizing bit budgets for each technique given a requirement on the allowed source distortion. These bounds are then combined with results from finite-blocklength literature to provide a framework for analyzing the effects of both quantization distortion and distortion due to decoding error probability (i.e., channel effects) on the incurred transmission latency. Our results show that there is an interesting interplay between source distortion (i.e., distortion for the probability vector measured via f-divergence) and the subsequent channel encoding/decoding parameters; and indicate that a joint design of these parameters is crucial to navigate the latency-distortion tradeoff. We study the impact of changing different parameters (e.g. number of classes, SNR, source distortion) on the latency-distortion tradeoff and perform experiments on AWGN and fading channels. Our results indicate that sparse lattice-based quantization is the most effective at minimizing latency across various regimes and for sparse, high-dimensional probability vectors (i.e., high number of classes).

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2024.

Builds on

15 of 45 references.

References · 15

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  3. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  4. 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,259
  5. 2017The Kinetics Human Action Video Datasetcited by 1,894
  6. 2020Deep Learning Enabled Semantic Communication Systemscited by 282
  7. 2022Beyond Transmitting Bits: Context, Semantics, and Task-Oriented Communicationscited by 166
  8. 2022Semantic Communications for Future Internet: Fundamentals, Applications, and Challengescited by 94
  9. 2018Deep Learning for Joint Source-Channel Coding of Textcited by 68
  10. 2020Bandwidth-Agile Image Transmission with Deep Joint Source-Channel Codingcited by 42
  11. 2022Deep Joint Source-Channel and Encryption Coding: Secure Semantic Communicationscited by 15
  12. 2018Wireless Access in Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communication (URLLC)cited by 13
3 more
  1. 2022Rate-Distortion Theory for Strategic Semantic Communicationcited by 12
  2. 2023Semantic Communication with Memorycited by 12
  3. 2020On the Latency, Rate and Reliability Tradeoff in Wireless Networked Control Systems for IIoTcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.