mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Automated Long Answer Grading with RiceChem Dataset

arXiv 2404.14316 ↗First posted 22 Apr 2024cs.CLcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce a new area of study in the field of educational Natural Language Processing: Automated Long Answer Grading (ALAG). Distinguishing itself from Automated Short Answer Grading (ASAG) and Automated Essay Grading (AEG), ALAG presents unique challenges due to the complexity and multifaceted nature of fact-based long answers. To study ALAG, we introduce RiceChem, a dataset derived from a college chemistry course, featuring real student responses to long-answer questions with an average word count notably higher than typical ASAG datasets. We propose a novel approach to ALAG by formulating it as a rubric entailment problem, employing natural language inference models to verify whether each criterion, represented by a rubric item, is addressed in the student's response. This formulation enables the effective use of MNLI for transfer learning, significantly improving the performance of models on the RiceChem dataset. We demonstrate the importance of rubric-based formulation in ALAG, showcasing its superiority over traditional score-based approaches in capturing the nuances of student responses. We also investigate the performance of models in cold start scenarios, providing valuable insights into the practical deployment considerations in educational settings. Lastly, we benchmark state-of-the-art open-sourced Large Language Models (LLMs) on RiceChem and compare their results to GPT models, highlighting the increased complexity of ALAG compared to ASAG. Despite leveraging the benefits of a rubric-based approach and transfer learning from MNLI, the lower performance of LLMs on RiceChem underscores the significant difficulty posed by the ALAG task. With this work, we offer a fresh perspective on grading long, fact-based answers and introduce a new dataset to stimulate further research in this important area. Code: urlhttps://github.com/luffycodes/Automated-Long-Answer-Grading.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2024.

Builds on

17 of 32 references.

References · 17

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  4. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
  5. 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
  6. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
  7. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,682
  8. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,592
  9. 2024Yi: Open Foundation Models by 01.AIcited by 719
  10. 2024OLMo: Accelerating the Science of Language Modelscited by 613
  11. 2023Textbooks Are All You Need II: phi-1.5 technical reportcited by 565
  12. 2020On the Stability of Fine-tuning BERT: Misconceptions, Explanations, and Strong Baselinescited by 255
5 more
  1. 2023CLASS: A Design Framework for building Intelligent Tutoring Systems based on Learning Science principlescited by 48
  2. 2021Many Hands Make Light Work: Using Essay Traits to Automatically Score Essayscited by 25
  3. 2024Pedagogical Alignment of Large Language Modelscited by 19
  4. 2023Performance of the Pre-Trained Large Language Model GPT-4 on Automated Short Answer Gradingcited by 15
  5. 2023Code Soliloquies for Accurate Calculations in Large Language Modelscited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 5.

10 papers.