Automated Long Answer Grading with RiceChem Dataset
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We introduce a new area of study in the field of educational Natural Language Processing: Automated Long Answer Grading (ALAG). Distinguishing itself from Automated Short Answer Grading (ASAG) and Automated Essay Grading (AEG), ALAG presents unique challenges due to the complexity and multifaceted nature of fact-based long answers. To study ALAG, we introduce RiceChem, a dataset derived from a college chemistry course, featuring real student responses to long-answer questions with an average word count notably higher than typical ASAG datasets. We propose a novel approach to ALAG by formulating it as a rubric entailment problem, employing natural language inference models to verify whether each criterion, represented by a rubric item, is addressed in the student's response. This formulation enables the effective use of MNLI for transfer learning, significantly improving the performance of models on the RiceChem dataset. We demonstrate the importance of rubric-based formulation in ALAG, showcasing its superiority over traditional score-based approaches in capturing the nuances of student responses. We also investigate the performance of models in cold start scenarios, providing valuable insights into the practical deployment considerations in educational settings. Lastly, we benchmark state-of-the-art open-sourced Large Language Models (LLMs) on RiceChem and compare their results to GPT models, highlighting the increased complexity of ALAG compared to ASAG. Despite leveraging the benefits of a rubric-based approach and transfer learning from MNLI, the lower performance of LLMs on RiceChem underscores the significant difficulty posed by the ALAG task. With this work, we offer a fresh perspective on grading long, fact-based answers and introduce a new dataset to stimulate further research in this important area. Code: urlhttps://github.com/luffycodes/Automated-Long-Answer-Grading.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2024.
Builds on
17 of 32 references.
References · 17
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
- 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
- 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
- 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,682
- 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,592
- 2024Yi: Open Foundation Models by 01.AIcited by 719
- 2024OLMo: Accelerating the Science of Language Modelscited by 613
- 2023Textbooks Are All You Need II: phi-1.5 technical reportcited by 565
- 2020On the Stability of Fine-tuning BERT: Misconceptions, Explanations, and Strong Baselinescited by 255
5 more
- 2023CLASS: A Design Framework for building Intelligent Tutoring Systems based on Learning Science principlescited by 48
- 2021Many Hands Make Light Work: Using Essay Traits to Automatically Score Essayscited by 25
- 2024Pedagogical Alignment of Large Language Modelscited by 19
- 2023Performance of the Pre-Trained Large Language Model GPT-4 on Automated Short Answer Gradingcited by 15
- 2023Code Soliloquies for Accurate Calculations in Large Language Modelscited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 5.
10 papers.
- 2024Student Data Paradox and Curious Case of Single Student-Tutor Model: Regressive Side Effects of Training LLMs for Personalized Learningcited by 6
- 2026Breaking the Chain: A Causal Analysis of LLM Faithfulness to Intermediate Structurescited by 6
- 2026Decision Models vs. LLMs as Rubric Judges: Cheaper, Faster, and Wrong in the Same Placescited by 6
- 2025Concept-based Rubrics Improve LLM Formative Assessment and Data Synthesiscited by 1
- 2025SAS-Bench: A Fine-Grained Benchmark for Evaluating Short Answer Scoring with Large Language Modelscited by 1
- 2025Ratas framework: A comprehensive genai-based approach to rubric-based marking of real-world textual examscited by 1
- 2025CLEAR-3K: Assessing Causal Explanatory Capabilities in Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026When Can We Trust LLM Graders? Calibrating Confidence for Automated Assessmentcited by 1
- 2026S-GRADES -- Studying Generalization of Student Response Assessments in Diverse Evaluative Settingscited by 0
- 2026A Human-in-the-Loop Framework for AI-Assisted Scoring in Large-Scale Writing Assessmentcited by 0
- 2026Decision Models vs. LLMs as Rubric Judges: Cheaper, Faster, and Wrong in the Same Places24 Sep 2026
- 2026A Human-in-the-Loop Framework for AI-Assisted Scoring in Large-Scale Writing Assessment4 Sep 2026
- 2026When Can We Trust LLM Graders? Calibrating Confidence for Automated Assessment31 Mar 2026
- 2026Breaking the Chain: A Causal Analysis of LLM Faithfulness to Intermediate Structures17 Mar 2026
- 2026S-GRADES -- Studying Generalization of Student Response Assessments in Diverse Evaluative Settings10 Mar 2026
- 2025CLEAR-3K: Assessing Causal Explanatory Capabilities in Language Models20 Jun 2025
- 2025Ratas framework: A comprehensive genai-based approach to rubric-based marking of real-world textual exams27 May 2025
- 2025SAS-Bench: A Fine-Grained Benchmark for Evaluating Short Answer Scoring with Large Language Models12 May 2025
- 2025Concept-based Rubrics Improve LLM Formative Assessment and Data Synthesis4 Apr 2025
- 2024Student Data Paradox and Curious Case of Single Student-Tutor Model: Regressive Side Effects of Training LLMs for Personalized Learning23 Apr 2024