mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Integrated Gradient Correlation: a Dataset-wise Attribution Method

arXiv 2404.13910 ↗First posted 22 Apr 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Attribution methods are primarily designed to study input component contributions to individual model predictions. However, some research applications require a summary of attribution patterns across the entire dataset to facilitate the interpretability of the scrutinized models at a task-level rather than an instance-level. It specifically applies when the localization of important input information is supposed to be stable for a specific problem but remains unidentified among numerous components. In this paper, we present a dataset-wise attribution method called Integrated Gradient Correlation (IGC) that enables region-specific analysis by a direct summation over associated components, and further relates the sum of all attributions to a model prediction score (correlation). We demonstrate IGC on synthetic data and fMRI neural signals (NSD dataset) with the study of the representation of image features in the brain and the estimation of the visual receptive field of neural populations. The resulting IGC attributions reveal selective patterns, coherent with respective model objectives.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2024.

Builds on

28 of 56 references.

References · 28

  1. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  3. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  4. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  5. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  6. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  7. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,611
  8. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,579
  9. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  10. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,436
  11. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
  12. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
16 more
  1. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
  2. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,109
  3. 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 990
  4. 2017Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbationcited by 612
  5. 2018A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networkscited by 476
  6. 2015Evaluating the visualization of what a Deep Neural Network has learnedcited by 419
  7. 2019The many Shapley values for model explanationcited by 344
  8. 2016Layer-wise Relevance Propagation for Neural Networks with Local Renormalization Layerscited by 199
  9. 2017Visualizing Deep Neural Network Decisions: Prediction Difference Analysiscited by 166
  10. 2019The Shapley Taylor Interaction Indexcited by 143
  11. 2021Guided Integrated Gradients: An Adaptive Path Method for Removing Noisecited by 102
  12. 2022A Rigorous Study of Integrated Gradients Method and Extensions to Internal Neuron Attributionscited by 64
  13. 2020Attribution in Scale and Spacecited by 61
  14. 2021Discretized Integrated Gradients for Explaining Language Modelscited by 46
  15. 2022Maximum Entropy Baseline for Integrated Gradientscited by 3
  16. 2023A New Baseline Assumption of Integated Gradients Based on Shaply valuecited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.