mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Transfer Learning for Molecular Property Predictions from Small Data Sets

arXiv 2404.13393 ↗First posted 20 Apr 2024cs.LG physics.chem-phcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning has emerged as a new tool in chemistry to bypass expensive experiments or quantum-chemical calculations, for example, in high-throughput screening applications. However, many machine learning studies rely on small data sets, making it difficult to efficiently implement powerful deep learning architectures such as message passing neural networks. In this study, we benchmark common machine learning models for the prediction of molecular properties on two small data sets, for which the best results are obtained with the message passing neural network PaiNN, as well as SOAP molecular descriptors concatenated to a set of simple molecular descriptors tailored to gradient boosting with regression trees. To further improve the predictive capabilities of PaiNN, we present a transfer learning strategy that uses large data sets to pre-train the respective models and allows to obtain more accurate models after fine-tuning on the original data sets. The pre-training labels are obtained from computationally cheap ab initio or semi-empirical models and both data sets are normalized to mean zero and standard deviation one to align the labels' distributions. This study covers two small chemistry data sets, the Harvard Organic Photovoltaics data set (HOPV, HOMO-LUMO-gaps), for which excellent results are obtained, and on the Freesolv data set (solvation energies), where this method is less successful, probably due to a complex underlying learning task and the dissimilar methods used to obtain pre-training and fine-tuning labels. Finally, we find that for the HOPV data set, the final training results do not improve monotonically with the size of the pre-training data set, but pre-training with fewer data points can lead to more biased pre-trained models and higher accuracy after fine-tuning.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Apr 2024.

Builds on

12 of 75 references.

References · 12

  1. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learningcited by 1,154
  2. 2014Show and Tell: A Neural Image Caption Generatorcited by 877
  3. 2021Equivariant message passing for the prediction of tensorial properties and molecular spectracited by 438
  4. 2020Machine Learning Force Fieldscited by 204
  5. 2019DScribe: Library of Descriptors for Machine Learning in Materials Sciencecited by 63
  6. 2022Does GNN Pretraining Help Molecular Representation?cited by 59
  7. 2022DPA-1: Pretraining of Attention-based Deep Potential Model for Molecular Simulationcited by 15
  8. 2022Transfer learning for chemically accurate interatomic neural network potentialscited by 11
  9. 2022Supervised Pretraining for Molecular Force Fields and Properties Predictioncited by 7
  10. 2022Injecting Domain Knowledge from Empirical Interatomic Potentials to Neural Networks for Predicting Material Propertiescited by 3
  11. 2021Graphical Gaussian Process Regression Model for Aqueous Solvation Free Energy Prediction of Organic Molecules in Redox Flow Batterycited by 1
  12. 2022Machine learning frontier orbital energies of nanodiamondscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.