mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Practical Considerations for Discrete-Time Implementations of Continuous-Time Control Barrier Function-Based Safety Filters

arXiv 2404.12329 ↗First posted 18 Apr 2024eess.SY cs.SYcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Safety filters based on control barrier functions (CBFs) have become a popular method to guarantee safety for uncertified control policies, e.g., as resulting from reinforcement learning. Here, safety is defined as staying in a pre-defined set, the safe set, that adheres to the system's state constraints, e.g., as given by lane boundaries for a self-driving vehicle. In this paper, we examine one commonly overlooked problem that arises in practical implementations of continuous-time CBF-based safety filters. In particular, we look at the issues caused by discrete-time implementations of the continuous-time CBF-based safety filter, especially for cases where the magnitude of the Lie derivative of the CBF with respect to the control input is zero or close to zero. When overlooked, this filter can result in undesirable chattering effects or constraint violations. In this work, we propose three mitigation strategies that allow us to use a continuous-time safety filter in a discrete-time implementation with a local relative degree. Using these strategies in augmented CBF-based safety filters, we achieve safety for all states in the safe set by either using an additional penalty term in the safety filtering objective or modifying the CBF such that those undesired states are not encountered during closed-loop operation. We demonstrate the presented issue and validate our three proposed mitigation strategies in simulation and on a real-world quadrotor.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Apr 2024.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Explicit Control Barrier Function-based Safety Filters and their Resource-Aware Computation
  2. 2024Preventing Inactive CBF Safety Filters Caused by Invalid Relative Degree Assumptions ↗
  3. 2025CBF-RL: Safety Filtering Reinforcement Learning in Training with Control Barrier Functions
  4. 2026Is Your Safe Controller Actually Safe? A Critical Review of CBF Tautologies and Hidden Assumptions
  5. 2025Learning Conservative Neural Control Barrier Functions from Offline Data
  6. 2024Disturbance Observer-based Control Barrier Functions with Residual Model Learning for Safe Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2025Multi-Constraint Safe Reinforcement Learning via Closed-form Solution for Log-Sum-Exp Approximation of Control Barrier Functions
  8. 2025Learning State-Action Control Barrier Functions for Model-Free Control under Constraints