mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Energy-Efficient Uncertainty-Aware Biomass Composition Prediction at the Edge

arXiv 2404.11230 ↗First posted 17 Apr 2024cs.CV cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Clover fixates nitrogen from the atmosphere to the ground, making grass-clover mixtures highly desirable to reduce external nitrogen fertilization. Herbage containing clover additionally promotes higher food intake, resulting in higher milk production. Herbage probing however remains largely unused as it requires a time-intensive manual laboratory analysis. Without this information, farmers are unable to perform localized clover sowing or take targeted fertilization decisions. Deep learning algorithms have been proposed with the goal to estimate the dry biomass composition from images of the grass directly in the fields. The energy-intensive nature of deep learning however limits deployment to practical edge devices such as smartphones. This paper proposes to fill this gap by applying filter pruning to reduce the energy requirement of existing deep learning solutions. We report that although pruned networks are accurate on controlled, high-quality images of the grass, they struggle to generalize to real-world smartphone images that are blurry or taken from challenging angles. We address this challenge by training filter-pruned models using a variance attenuation loss so they can predict the uncertainty of their predictions. When the uncertainty exceeds a threshold, we re-infer using a more accurate unpruned model. This hybrid approach allows us to reduce energy consumption while retaining a high accuracy. We evaluate our algorithm on two datasets: the GrassClover and the Irish clover using an NVIDIA Jetson Nano edge device. We find that we reduce energy reduction with respect to state-of-the-art solutions by 50% on average with only 4% accuracy loss.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Apr 2024.

Builds on

14 of 24 references.

References · 14

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  3. 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,291
  4. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
  5. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
  6. 2016Pruning Filters for Efficient ConvNetscited by 1,129
  7. 2016EIE: Efficient Inference Engine on Compressed Deep Neural Networkcited by 291
  8. 2015Structured Pruning of Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 148
  9. 2022A Deeper Look into Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty Disentanglementcited by 87
  10. 2019Non-Structured DNN Weight Pruning -- Is It Beneficial in Any Platform?cited by 31
  11. 2022Complexity-Driven CNN Compression for Resource-constrained Edge AIcited by 8
  12. 2018Studying the Plasticity in Deep Convolutional Neural Networks using Random Pruningcited by 6
2 more
  1. 2022Unsupervised domain adaptation and super resolution on drone images for autonomous dry herbage biomass estimationcited by 3
  2. 2022Utilizing unsupervised learning to improve sward content prediction and herbage mass estimationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.