Revealing data leakage in protein interaction benchmarks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In recent years, there has been remarkable progress in machine learning for protein-protein interactions. However, prior work has predominantly focused on improving learning algorithms, with less attention paid to evaluation strategies and data preparation. Here, we demonstrate that further development of machine learning methods may be hindered by the quality of existing train-test splits. Specifically, we find that commonly used splitting strategies for protein complexes, based on protein sequence or metadata similarity, introduce major data leakage. This may result in overoptimistic evaluation of generalization, as well as unfair benchmarking of the models, biased towards assessing their overfitting capacity rather than practical utility. To overcome the data leakage, we recommend constructing data splits based on 3D structural similarity of protein-protein interfaces and suggest corresponding algorithms. We believe that addressing the data leakage problem is critical for further progress in this research area.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Apr 2024.
Builds on
14 of 60 references.
References · 14
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,588
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,320
- 2022DiffDock: Diffusion Steps, Twists, and Turns for Molecular Dockingcited by 311
- 2021Independent SE(3)-Equivariant Models for End-to-End Rigid Protein Dockingcited by 81
- 2018End-to-End Learning on 3D Protein Structure for Interface Predictioncited by 33
- 2023DiffDock-PP: Rigid Protein-Protein Docking with Diffusion Modelscited by 24
- 2017DeepRank: A New Deep Architecture for Relevance Ranking in Information Retrievalcited by 21
- 2020Pre-training of Graph Neural Network for Modeling Effects of Mutations on Protein-Protein Binding Affinitycited by 18
- 2021Geometric Transformers for Protein Interface Contact Predictioncited by 18
- 2023Learning to design protein-protein interactions with enhanced generalizationcited by 16
- 2021DIPS-Plus: The Enhanced Database of Interacting Protein Structures for Interface Predictioncited by 10
- 2023Predicting mutational effects on protein-protein binding via a side-chain diffusion probabilistic modelcited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.
5 papers.
- 2025Beyond Simple Concatenation: Fairly Assessing PLM Architectures for Multi-Chain Protein-Protein Interactions Predictioncited by 2
- 2026MassSpecGym in the Wild: Uncovering and Correcting Evaluation Pitfalls in AI-Driven Molecule Discoverycited by 2
- 2026PepSpecBench: A Unified Evaluation Benchmark for Peptide Tandem Mass Spectrometry Predictioncited by 0
- 2026Enhancing Protein-Protein Interaction Prediction with Hierarchical Motif-based Multimodal Protein Embeddingcited by 0
- 2026ReLaG: A Scalable Framework Generalizing Random Splits to Data with Latent Relationscited by 0
- 2026ReLaG: A Scalable Framework Generalizing Random Splits to Data with Latent Relations29 Sep 2026
- 2026MassSpecGym in the Wild: Uncovering and Correcting Evaluation Pitfalls in AI-Driven Molecule Discovery17 Jun 2026
- 2026Enhancing Protein-Protein Interaction Prediction with Hierarchical Motif-based Multimodal Protein Embedding30 May 2026
- 2026PepSpecBench: A Unified Evaluation Benchmark for Peptide Tandem Mass Spectrometry Prediction3 May 2026
- 2025Beyond Simple Concatenation: Fairly Assessing PLM Architectures for Multi-Chain Protein-Protein Interactions Prediction26 May 2025