mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification For Pre-trained Neural Network

arXiv 2404.10124 ↗First posted 15 Apr 2024cs.LG cs.CVcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Epistemic uncertainty quantification (UQ) identifies where models lack knowledge. Traditional UQ methods, often based on Bayesian neural networks, are not suitable for pre-trained non-Bayesian models. Our study addresses quantifying epistemic uncertainty for any pre-trained model, which does not need the original training data or model modifications and can ensure broad applicability regardless of network architectures or training techniques. Specifically, we propose a gradient-based approach to assess epistemic uncertainty, analyzing the gradients of outputs relative to model parameters, and thereby indicating necessary model adjustments to accurately represent the inputs. We first explore theoretical guarantees of gradient-based methods for epistemic UQ, questioning the view that this uncertainty is only calculable through differences between multiple models. We further improve gradient-driven UQ by using class-specific weights for integrating gradients and emphasizing distinct contributions from neural network layers. Additionally, we enhance UQ accuracy by combining gradient and perturbation methods to refine the gradients. We evaluate our approach on out-of-distribution detection, uncertainty calibration, and active learning, demonstrating its superiority over current state-of-the-art UQ methods for pre-trained models.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2024.

Builds on

25 of 40 references.

References · 25

  1. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  2. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  3. 2015LSUN: Construction of a Large-scale Image Dataset using Deep Learning with Humans in the Loopcited by 1,355
  4. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,109
  5. 2019A Simple Baseline for Bayesian Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 560
  6. 2018Predictive Uncertainty Estimation via Prior Networkscited by 557
  7. 2021Laplace Redux -- Effortless Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 365
  8. 2014Stochastic Gradient Hamiltonian Monte Carlocited by 343
  9. 2021On the Importance of Gradients for Detecting Distributional Shifts in the Wildcited by 339
  10. 2020Being Bayesian, Even Just a Bit, Fixes Overconfidence in ReLU Networkscited by 231
  11. 2019Cyclical Stochastic Gradient MCMC for Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 203
  12. 2019Ensemble Distribution Distillationcited by 158
13 more
  1. 2017Multiplicative Normalizing Flows for Variational Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 157
  2. 2020Bayesian Deep Learning via Subnetwork Inferencecited by 87
  3. 2018Bayesian Uncertainty Estimation for Batch Normalized Deep Networkscited by 70
  4. 2021On the Practicality of Deterministic Epistemic Uncertaintycited by 62
  5. 2020Gradients as a Measure of Uncertainty in Neural Networkscited by 55
  6. 2021Sketching Curvature for Efficient Out-of-Distribution Detection for Deep Neural Networkscited by 32
  7. 2020Estimating Model Uncertainty of Neural Networks in Sparse Information Formcited by 31
  8. 2019Training-Free Uncertainty Estimation for Dense Regression: Sensitivity as a Surrogatecited by 28
  9. 2023Quantification of Uncertainty with Adversarial Modelscited by 28
  10. 2022How Useful are Gradients for OOD Detection Really?cited by 20
  11. 2020Encoding the latent posterior of Bayesian Neural Networks for uncertainty quantificationcited by 18
  12. 2023Dropout Injection at Test Time for Post Hoc Uncertainty Quantification in Neural Networkscited by 14
  13. 2021Adversarial Attack for Uncertainty Estimation: Identifying Critical Regions in Neural Networkscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 6.

10 papers.