Multiply-Robust Causal Change Attribution
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Comparing two samples of data, we observe a change in the distribution of an outcome variable. In the presence of multiple explanatory variables, how much of the change can be explained by each possible cause? We develop a new estimation strategy that, given a causal model, combines regression and re-weighting methods to quantify the contribution of each causal mechanism. Our proposed methodology is multiply robust, meaning that it still recovers the target parameter under partial misspecification. We prove that our estimator is consistent and asymptotically normal. Moreover, it can be incorporated into existing frameworks for causal attribution, such as Shapley values, which will inherit the consistency and large-sample distribution properties. Our method demonstrates excellent performance in Monte Carlo simulations, and we show its usefulness in an empirical application. Our method is implemented as part of the Python library DoWhy (arXiv:2011.04216, arXiv:2206.06821).
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Apr 2024.
Builds on
13 of 47 references.
References · 13
- 2022Algorithms to estimate Shapley value feature attributionscited by 114
- 2020DoWhy: An End-to-End Library for Causal Inferencecited by 92
- 2019Causal structure based root cause analysis of outlierscited by 65
- 2022DoWhy-GCM: An extension of DoWhy for causal inference in graphical causal modelscited by 40
- 2023Approximating the Shapley Value without Marginal Contributionscited by 34
- 2013Program Evaluation and Causal Inference with High-Dimensional Datacited by 29
- 2022Towards Explaining Distribution Shiftscited by 26
- 2021Long Story Short: Omitted Variable Bias in Causal Machine Learningcited by 23
- 2019Permutation Weightingcited by 14
- 2020Quantifying intrinsic causal contributions via structure preserving interventionscited by 12
- 2015The Sorted Effects Method: Discovering Heterogeneous Effects Beyond Their Averagescited by 4
- 2022The Counterfactual-Shapley Value: Attributing Change in System Metricscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.
- 2025"Who experiences large model decay and why?" A Hierarchical Framework for Diagnosing Heterogeneous Performance Driftcited by 0
- 2026Do covariates explain why these groups differ? The choice of reference group can reverse conclusions in the Oaxaca-Blinder decompositioncited by 0
- 2026SCARV: Structure-Constrained Aggregation for Stable Sample Ranking in Redundant NLP Datasetscited by 0
- 2026SCARV: Structure-Constrained Aggregation for Stable Sample Ranking in Redundant NLP Datasets1 May 2026
- 2026Do covariates explain why these groups differ? The choice of reference group can reverse conclusions in the Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition31 Mar 2026
- 2025"Who experiences large model decay and why?" A Hierarchical Framework for Diagnosing Heterogeneous Performance Drift31 May 2025