Minimax Optimal Goodness-of-Fit Testing with Kernel Stein Discrepancy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We explore the minimax optimality of goodness-of-fit tests on general domains using the kernelized Stein discrepancy (KSD). The KSD framework offers a flexible approach for goodness-of-fit testing, avoiding strong distributional assumptions, accommodating diverse data structures beyond Euclidean spaces, and relying only on partial knowledge of the reference distribution, while maintaining computational efficiency. Although KSD is a powerful framework for goodness-of-fit testing, only the consistency of the corresponding tests has been established so far, and their statistical optimality remains largely unexplored. In this paper, we develop a general framework and an operator-theoretic representation of the KSD, encompassing many existing KSD tests in the literature, which vary depending on the domain. Building on this representation, we propose a modified discrepancy by applying the concept of spectral regularization to the KSD framework. We establish the minimax optimality of the proposed regularized test for a wide range of the smoothness parameter θ under a specific alternative space, defined over general domains, using the chi2-divergence as the separation metric. In contrast, we demonstrate that the unregularized KSD test fails to achieve the minimax separation rate for the considered alternative space. Additionally, we introduce an adaptive test capable of achieving minimax optimality up to a logarithmic factor by adapting to unknown parameters. Through numerical experiments, we illustrate the superior performance of our proposed tests across various domains compared to their unregularized counterparts.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Apr 2024.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.
9 papers.
- 2024Improved Finite-Particle Convergence Rates for Stein Variational Gradient Descentcited by 13
- 2024On the Robustness of Kernel Goodness-of-Fit Testscited by 7
- 2024Nystr"om Kernel Stein Discrepancycited by 4
- 2026Sobolev Regularized MMD Gradient Flowcited by 3
- 2026Minimax Estimation of Kernel Stein Discrepancy: Trace versus Hilbert-Schmidt Scalescited by 3
- 2025The Minimax Lower Bound of Kernel Stein Discrepancy Estimationcited by 2
- 2026Minimax Lower Bounds of Kernel Discrepancy Estimation: MMD, HSIC, KSDcited by 2
- 2025Optimal Online Change Detection via Random Fourier Featurescited by 1
- 2025Stein Discrepancy for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 0
- 2026Minimax Lower Bounds of Kernel Discrepancy Estimation: MMD, HSIC, KSD27 Jul 2026
- 2026Minimax Estimation of Kernel Stein Discrepancy: Trace versus Hilbert-Schmidt Scales3 Jul 2026
- 2026Sobolev Regularized MMD Gradient Flow12 May 2026
- 2025The Minimax Lower Bound of Kernel Stein Discrepancy Estimation16 Oct 2025
- 2025Optimal Online Change Detection via Random Fourier Features23 May 2025
- 2025Stein Discrepancy for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation5 Feb 2025
- 2024Improved Finite-Particle Convergence Rates for Stein Variational Gradient Descent13 Sep 2024
- 2024On the Robustness of Kernel Goodness-of-Fit Tests11 Aug 2024
- 2024Nystr"om Kernel Stein Discrepancy12 Jun 2024