Leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) to Support Collaborative Human-AI Online Risk Data Annotation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this position paper, we discuss the potential for leveraging LLMs as interactive research tools to facilitate collaboration between human coders and AI to effectively annotate online risk data at scale. Collaborative human-AI labeling is a promising approach to annotating large-scale and complex data for various tasks. Yet, tools and methods to support effective human-AI collaboration for data annotation are under-studied. This gap is pertinent because co-labeling tasks need to support a two-way interactive discussion that can add nuance and context, particularly in the context of online risk, which is highly subjective and contextualized. Therefore, we provide some of the early benefits and challenges of using LLMs-based tools for risk annotation and suggest future directions for the HCI research community to leverage LLMs as research tools to facilitate human-AI collaboration in contextualized online data annotation. Our research interests align very well with the purposes of the LLMs as Research Tools workshop to identify ongoing applications and challenges of using LLMs to work with data in HCI research. We anticipate learning valuable insights from organizers and participants into how LLMs can help reshape the HCI community's methods for working with data.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Apr 2024.
Builds on
7 of 38 references.
References · 7
- 2023Is ChatGPT better than Human Annotators? Potential and Limitations of ChatGPT in Explaining Implicit Hate Speechcited by 165
- 2023Summary of ChatGPT-Related Research and Perspective Towards the Future of Large Language Modelscited by 152
- 2022How would Stance Detection Techniques Evolve after the Launch of ChatGPT?cited by 76
- 2022Human-AI Collaboration via Conditional Delegation: A Case Study of Content Moderationcited by 66
- 2019Garbage In, Garbage Out? Do Machine Learning Application Papers in Social Computing Report Where Human-Labeled Training Data Comes From?cited by 64
- 2019Discovering the Sweet Spot of Human-Computer Configurations: A Case Study in Information Extractioncited by 11
- 2023QualiGPT: GPT as an easy-to-use tool for qualitative codingcited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.
2 papers.