mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

We're Calling an Intervention: Exploring Fundamental Hurdles in Adapting Language Models to Nonstandard Text

arXiv 2404.07304 ↗First posted 10 Apr 2024cs.CLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present a suite of experiments that allow us to understand the underlying challenges of language model adaptation to nonstandard text. We do so by designing interventions that approximate core features of user-generated text and their interactions with existing biases of language models. Applying our interventions during language model adaptation to nonstandard text variations, we gain important insights into when such adaptation is successful, as well as the aspects of text variation and noise that are particularly difficult for language models to handle. For instance, on text with character-level variation, out-of-the-box performance improves even with a few additional training examples but approaches a plateau, suggesting that more data is not the solution. In contrast, on text with variation involving new words or meanings, far more data is needed, but it leads to a massive breakthrough in performance. Our findings reveal that existing models lack the necessary infrastructure to handle diverse forms of nonstandard text, guiding the development of more resilient language modeling techniques. We make the code for our interventions, which can be applied to any English text data, publicly available.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Apr 2024.

Builds on

19 of 39 references.

References · 19

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  3. 2021CANINE: Pre-training an Efficient Tokenization-Free Encoder for Language Representationcited by 229
  4. 2016Demographic Dialectal Variation in Social Media: A Case Study of African-American Englishcited by 194
  5. 2019Challenges in Building Intelligent Open-domain Dialog Systemscited by 147
  6. 2020CharacterBERT: Reconciling ELMo and BERT for Word-Level Open-Vocabulary Representations From Characterscited by 87
  7. 2023Towards a Common Understanding of Contributing Factors for Cross-Lingual Transfer in Multilingual Language Models: A Reviewcited by 50
  8. 2024DIALECTBENCH: A NLP Benchmark for Dialects, Varieties, and Closely-Related Languagescited by 49
  9. 2021When is BERT Multilingual? Isolating Crucial Ingredients for Cross-lingual Transfercited by 41
  10. 2024Natural Language Processing for Dialects of a Language: A Surveycited by 40
  11. 2023Quantifying the Dialect Gap and its Correlates Across Languagescited by 33
  12. 2023Does Manipulating Tokenization Aid Cross-Lingual Transfer? A Study on POS Tagging for Non-Standardized Languagescited by 19
7 more
  1. 2020On the Robustness of Language Encoders against Grammatical Errorscited by 18
  2. 2020Stress Test Evaluation of Transformer-based Models in Natural Language Understanding Taskscited by 17
  3. 2023TADA: Task-Agnostic Dialect Adapters for Englishcited by 15
  4. 2022Oolong: Investigating What Makes Transfer Learning Hard with Controlled Studiescited by 9
  5. 2023Fine-Tuning BERT with Character-Level Noise for Zero-Shot Transfer to Dialects and Closely-Related Languagescited by 9
  6. 2022MaxMatch-Dropout: Subword Regularization for WordPiececited by 8
  7. 2023BERTwich: Extending BERT's Capabilities to Model Dialectal and Noisy Textcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

6 papers.