mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Public-private funding models in open source software development: A case study on scikit-learn

arXiv 2404.06484 ↗First posted 9 Apr 2024cs.SE cs.AI cs.CYcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Governments are increasingly funding open source software (OSS) development to support software security, digital sovereignty, and national competitiveness in science and innovation, amongst others. However, little is known about how OSS developers evaluate the relative benefits and drawbacks of governmental funding for OSS. This study explores this question through a case study on scikit-learn, a Python library for machine learning, funded by public research grants, commercial sponsorship, micro-donations, and a 32 euro million grant announced in France's artificial intelligence strategy. Through 25 interviews with scikit-learn's maintainers and funders, this study makes two key contributions. First, it contributes empirical findings about the benefits and drawbacks of public and private funding in an impactful OSS project, and the governance protocols employed by the maintainers to balance the diverse interests of their community and funders. Second, it offers practical lessons on funding for OSS developers, governments, and companies based on the experience of scikit-learn. The paper concludes with key recommendations for practitioners and future research directions.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 100 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Apr 2024.

Builds on

9 of 100 references.

References · 9

  1. 2017Why Modern Open Source Projects Failcited by 8
  2. 2019On the abandonment and survival of open source projects: An empirical investigationcited by 5
  3. 2018Do software firms collaborate or compete? A model of coopetition in community-initiated OSS projectscited by 4
  4. 2016Cooperation among competitors in the open-source arena: The case of OpenStackcited by 3
  5. 2023How Early Participation Determines Long-Term Sustained Activity in GitHub Projects?cited by 3
  6. 2018Are Donation Badges Appealing? A Case Study of Developer Responses to Eclipse Bug Reportscited by 2
  7. 2021Who, What, Why and How? Towards the Monetary Incentive in Crowd Collaboration: A Case Study of Github's Sponsor Mechanismcited by 1
  8. 2022Identifying Emergent Leadership in OSS Projects Based on Communication Stylescited by 1
  9. 2023Is It Enough to Recommend Tasks to Newcomers? Understanding Mentoring on Good First Issuescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 1.

5 papers.