AdaGossip: Adaptive Consensus Step-size for Decentralized Deep Learning with Communication Compression
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Decentralized learning is crucial in supporting on-device learning over large distributed datasets, eliminating the need for a central server. However, the communication overhead remains a major bottleneck for the practical realization of such decentralized setups. To tackle this issue, several algorithms for decentralized training with compressed communication have been proposed in the literature. Most of these algorithms introduce an additional hyper-parameter referred to as consensus step-size which is tuned based on the compression ratio at the beginning of the training. In this work, we propose AdaGossip, a novel technique that adaptively adjusts the consensus step-size based on the compressed model differences between neighboring agents. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method through an exhaustive set of experiments on various Computer Vision datasets (CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, Fashion MNIST, Imagenette, and ImageNet), model architectures, and network topologies. Our experiments show that the proposed method achieves superior performance (0-2% improvement in test accuracy) compared to the current state-of-the-art method for decentralized learning with communication compression.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Apr 2024.
Builds on
20 of 26 references.
References · 20
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2016Federated Optimization: Distributed Machine Learning for On-Device Intelligencecited by 558
- 2017Can Decentralized Algorithms Outperform Centralized Algorithms? A Case Study for Decentralized Parallel Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 496
- 2019PowerSGD: Practical Low-Rank Gradient Compression for Distributed Optimizationcited by 234
- 2019Decentralized Stochastic Optimization and Gossip Algorithms with Compressed Communicationcited by 218
- 2018Stochastic Gradient Push for Distributed Deep Learningcited by 152
- 2019Decentralized Deep Learning with Arbitrary Communication Compressioncited by 109
- 2021Quasi-Global Momentum: Accelerating Decentralized Deep Learning on Heterogeneous Datacited by 69
8 more
- 2020Evolving Normalization-Activation Layerscited by 45
- 2022BEER: Fast O(1/T) Rate for Decentralized Nonconvex Optimization with Communication Compressioncited by 41
- 2020PowerGossip: Practical Low-Rank Communication Compression in Decentralized Deep Learningcited by 35
- 2020Quantized Decentralized Stochastic Learning over Directed Graphscited by 24
- 2020Moniqua: Modulo Quantized Communication in Decentralized SGDcited by 24
- 2019textttDeepSqueeze: Decentralization Meets Error-Compensated Compressioncited by 21
- 2021Sparse-Push: Communication- & Energy-Efficient Decentralized Distributed Learning over Directed & Time-Varying Graphs with non-IID Datasetscited by 6
- 2021Low Precision Decentralized Distributed Training over IID and non-IID Datacited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.