mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Relation Extraction Using Large Language Models: A Case Study on Acupuncture Point Locations

arXiv 2404.05415 ↗First posted 8 Apr 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In acupuncture therapy, the accurate location of acupoints is essential for its effectiveness. The advanced language understanding capabilities of large language models (LLMs) like Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPT) present a significant opportunity for extracting relations related to acupoint locations from textual knowledge sources. This study aims to compare the performance of GPT with traditional deep learning models (Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers for Biomedical Text Mining (BioBERT)) in extracting acupoint-related location relations and assess the impact of pretraining and fine-tuning on GPT's performance. We utilized the World Health Organization Standard Acupuncture Point Locations in the Western Pacific Region (WHO Standard) as our corpus, which consists of descriptions of 361 acupoints. Five types of relations ('direction_of,' 'distance_of,' 'part_of,' 'near_acupoint,' and 'located_near') (n= 3,174) between acupoints were annotated. Five models were compared: BioBERT, LSTM, pre-trained GPT-3.5, fine-tuned GPT-3.5, as well as pre-trained GPT-4. Performance metrics included micro-average exact match precision, recall, and F1 scores. Our results demonstrate that fine-tuned GPT-3.5 consistently outperformed other models in F1 scores across all relation types. Overall, it achieved the highest micro-average F1 score of 0.92. This study underscores the effectiveness of LLMs like GPT in extracting relations related to acupoint locations, with implications for accurately modeling acupuncture knowledge and promoting standard implementation in acupuncture training and practice. The findings also contribute to advancing informatics applications in traditional and complementary medicine, showcasing the potential of LLMs in natural language processing.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Apr 2024.

Builds on

10 of 57 references.

References · 10

  1. 2019BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text miningcited by 1,935
  2. 2020Compressing Large-Scale Transformer-Based Models: A Case Study on BERTcited by 95
  3. 2023A Survey of GPT-3 Family Large Language Models Including ChatGPT and GPT-4cited by 81
  4. 2020More Data, More Relations, More Context and More Openness: A Review and Outlook for Relation Extractioncited by 52
  5. 2021On the Lack of Robust Interpretability of Neural Text Classifierscited by 17
  6. 2019Learning to Remember More with Less Memorizationcited by 14
  7. 2023AE-GPT: Using Large Language Models to Extract Adverse Events from Surveillance Reports-A Use Case with Influenza Vaccine Adverse Eventscited by 8
  8. 2018Learning to Skip Ineffectual Recurrent Computations in LSTMscited by 3
  9. 2019Training Optimus Prime, M.D.: Generating Medical Certification Items by Fine-Tuning OpenAI's gpt2 Transformer Modelcited by 3
  10. 2024Automated Generation of Multiple-Choice Cloze Questions for Assessing English Vocabulary Using GPT-turbo 3.5cited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

3 papers.