Physics-Informed Machine Learning for Battery Degradation Diagnostics: A Comparison of State-of-the-Art Methods
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Monitoring the health of lithium-ion batteries' internal components as they age is crucial for optimizing cell design and usage control strategies. However, quantifying component-level degradation typically involves aging many cells and destructively analyzing them throughout the aging test, limiting the scope of quantifiable degradation to the test conditions and duration. Fortunately, recent advances in physics-informed machine learning (PIML) for modeling and predicting the battery state of health demonstrate the feasibility of building models to predict the long-term degradation of a lithium-ion battery cell's major components using only short-term aging test data by leveraging physics. In this paper, we present four approaches for building physics-informed machine learning models and comprehensively compare them, considering accuracy, complexity, ease-of-implementation, and their ability to extrapolate to untested conditions. We delve into the details of each physics-informed machine learning method, providing insights specific to implementing them on small battery aging datasets. Our study utilizes long-term cycle aging data from 24 implantable-grade lithium-ion cells subjected to varying temperatures and C-rates over four years. This paper aims to facilitate the selection of an appropriate physics-informed machine learning method for predicting long-term degradation in lithium-ion batteries, using short-term aging data while also providing insights about when to choose which method for general predictive purposes.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Apr 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.
6 papers.
- 2025Disentangling Slow and Fast Temporal Dynamics in Degradation Inference with Hierarchical Differential Modelscited by 3
- 2025Diagnostic-free onboard battery health assessmentcited by 1
- 2026TIDE: Trustworthy and Interpretable Battery Degradation Estimation with Contextual Learning and Symbolic Distillationcited by 1
- 2024A Scientific Machine Learning Approach for Predicting and Forecasting Battery Degradation in Electric Vehiclescited by 0
- 2026Physics-Informed Machine Learning in Prognostics and Health Management: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 0
- 2026Data-efficient crack quantification in lithium-ion cathodes using foundation model transfercited by 0
- 2026Data-efficient crack quantification in lithium-ion cathodes using foundation model transfer27 Aug 2026
- 2026Physics-Informed Machine Learning in Prognostics and Health Management: A Systematic Literature Review10 Aug 2026
- 2026TIDE: Trustworthy and Interpretable Battery Degradation Estimation with Contextual Learning and Symbolic Distillation16 Jul 2026
- 2025Disentangling Slow and Fast Temporal Dynamics in Degradation Inference with Hierarchical Differential Models30 Aug 2025
- 2025Diagnostic-free onboard battery health assessment10 Mar 2025
- 2024A Scientific Machine Learning Approach for Predicting and Forecasting Battery Degradation in Electric Vehicles18 Oct 2024