mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Performance of computer vision algorithms for fine-grained classification using crowdsourced insect images

arXiv 2404.03474 ↗First posted 4 Apr 2024cs.CV cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With fine-grained classification, we identify unique characteristics to distinguish among classes of the same super-class. We are focusing on species recognition in Insecta, as they are critical for biodiversity monitoring and at the base of many ecosystems. With citizen science campaigns, billions of images are collected in the wild. Once these are labelled, experts can use them to create distribution maps. However, the labelling process is time-consuming, which is where computer vision comes in. The field of computer vision offers a wide range of algorithms, each with its strengths and weaknesses; how do we identify the algorithm that is in line with our application? To answer this question, we provide a full and detailed evaluation of nine algorithms among deep convolutional networks (CNN), vision transformers (ViT), and locality-based vision transformers (LBVT) on 4 different aspects: classification performance, embedding quality, computational cost, and gradient activity. We offer insights that we haven't yet had in this domain proving to which extent these algorithms solve the fine-grained tasks in Insecta. We found that the ViT performs the best on inference speed and computational cost while the LBVT outperforms the others on performance and embedding quality; the CNN provide a trade-off among the metrics.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Apr 2024.

Builds on

23 of 44 references.

References · 23

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  4. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  5. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  6. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  7. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  8. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
  9. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
  10. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
  11. 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
  12. 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,509
11 more
  1. 2021EfficientNetV2: Smaller Models and Faster Trainingcited by 1,127
  2. 2021Tokens-to-Token ViT: Training Vision Transformers from Scratch on ImageNetcited by 1,096
  3. 2021ConViT: Improving Vision Transformers with Soft Convolutional Inductive Biasescited by 484
  4. 2019On the Relationship between Self-Attention and Convolutional Layerscited by 299
  5. 2022ViTAEv2: Vision Transformer Advanced by Exploring Inductive Bias for Image Recognition and Beyondcited by 117
  6. 2022Cross-Architecture Knowledge Distillationcited by 40
  7. 2020Accelerator-aware Neural Network Design using AutoMLcited by 30
  8. 2021Theory of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks III: Approximating Radial Functionscited by 22
  9. 2019Modeling Teacher-Student Techniques in Deep Neural Networks for Knowledge Distillationcited by 11
  10. 2016Automatic Moth Detection from Trap Images for Pest Managementcited by 10
  11. 2022Vision Transformers: State of the Art and Research Challengescited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.