mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

How Much Data are Enough? Investigating Dataset Requirements for Patch-Based Brain MRI Segmentation Tasks

arXiv 2404.03451 ↗First posted 4 Apr 2024cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Training deep neural networks reliably requires access to large-scale datasets. However, obtaining such datasets can be challenging, especially in the context of neuroimaging analysis tasks, where the cost associated with image acquisition and annotation can be prohibitive. To mitigate both the time and financial costs associated with model development, a clear understanding of the amount of data required to train a satisfactory model is crucial. This paper focuses on an early stage phase of deep learning research, prior to model development, and proposes a strategic framework for estimating the amount of annotated data required to train patch-based segmentation networks. This framework includes the establishment of performance expectations using a novel Minor Boundary Adjustment for Threshold (MinBAT) method, and standardizing patch selection through the ROI-based Expanded Patch Selection (REPS) method. Our experiments demonstrate that tasks involving regions of interest (ROIs) with different sizes or shapes may yield variably acceptable Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) scores. By setting an acceptable DSC as the target, the required amount of training data can be estimated and even predicted as data accumulates. This approach could assist researchers and engineers in estimating the cost associated with data collection and annotation when defining a new segmentation task based on deep neural networks, ultimately contributing to their efficient translation to real-world applications.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Apr 2024.

Builds on

13 of 37 references.

References · 13

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  3. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  4. 20163D U-Net: Learning Dense Volumetric Segmentation from Sparse Annotationcited by 1,471
  5. 2017A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysiscited by 1,182
  6. 2017Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Eracited by 916
  7. 2017Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empiricallycited by 556
  8. 2018nnU-Net: Self-adapting Framework for U-Net-Based Medical Image Segmentationcited by 291
  9. 2021Common Limitations of Image Processing Metrics: A Picture Storycited by 58
  10. 2019Continuous Dice Coefficient: a Method for Evaluating Probabilistic Segmentationscited by 25
  11. 2022How Much More Data Do I Need? Estimating Requirements for Downstream Taskscited by 22
  12. 2023Learning to Segment from Noisy Annotations: A Spatial Correction Approachcited by 16
1 more
  1. 2023Full or Weak annotations? An adaptive strategy for budget-constrained annotation campaignscited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.