mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

REACT: Revealing Evolutionary Action Consequence Trajectories for Interpretable Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2404.03359 ↗First posted 4 Apr 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.NEcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

To enhance the interpretability of Reinforcement Learning (RL), we propose Revealing Evolutionary Action Consequence Trajectories (REACT). In contrast to the prevalent practice of validating RL models based on their optimal behavior learned during training, we posit that considering a range of edge-case trajectories provides a more comprehensive understanding of their inherent behavior. To induce such scenarios, we introduce a disturbance to the initial state, optimizing it through an evolutionary algorithm to generate a diverse population of demonstrations. To evaluate the fitness of trajectories, REACT incorporates a joint fitness function that encourages both local and global diversity in the encountered states and chosen actions. Through assessments with policies trained for varying durations in discrete and continuous environments, we demonstrate the descriptive power of REACT. Our results highlight its effectiveness in revealing nuanced aspects of RL models' behavior beyond optimal performance, thereby contributing to improved interpretability.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Apr 2024.

Builds on

15 of 31 references.

References · 15

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  4. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  5. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
  6. 2020D4RL: Datasets for Deep Data-Driven Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,406
  7. 2019Leveraging Procedural Generation to Benchmark Reinforcement Learningcited by 478
  8. 2020Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin Rankingcited by 259
  9. 2020Effective Diversity in Population Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 116
  10. 2021Interpretable Deep Learning: Interpretation, Interpretability, Trustworthiness, and Beyondcited by 116
  11. 2018Establishing Appropriate Trust via Critical Statescited by 47
  12. 2017Enabling Robots to Communicate their Objectivescited by 34
3 more
  1. 2019Exploring Computational User Models for Agent Policy Summarizationcited by 29
  2. 2018Evolutionary Diversity Optimization Using Multi-Objective Indicatorscited by 9
  3. 2018Inheritance-Based Diversity Measures for Explicit Convergence Control in Evolutionary Algorithmscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.