Smooth Deep Saliency
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this work, we investigate methods to reduce the noise in deep saliency maps coming from convolutional downsampling. Those methods make the investigated models more interpretable for gradient-based saliency maps, computed in hidden layers. We evaluate the faithfulness of those methods using insertion and deletion metrics, finding that saliency maps computed in hidden layers perform better compared to both the input layer and GradCAM. We test our approach on different models trained for image classification on ImageNet1K, and models trained for tumor detection on Camelyon16 and in-house real-world digital pathology scans of stained tissue samples. Our results show that the checkerboard noise in the gradient gets reduced, resulting in smoother and therefore easier to interpret saliency maps.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2024.
Builds on
12 of 23 references.
References · 12
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
- 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
- 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,109
- 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 838
- 2020Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorchcited by 547
- 2022Towards Better Understanding Attribution Methodscited by 28
Built on by
Not cited yet.