mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Sentiment Analysis of Citations in Scientific Articles Using ChatGPT: Identifying Potential Biases and Conflicts of Interest

arXiv 2404.01800 ↗First posted 2 Apr 2024cs.DL cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Scientific articles play a crucial role in advancing knowledge and informing research directions. One key aspect of evaluating scientific articles is the analysis of citations, which provides insights into the impact and reception of the cited works. This article introduces the innovative use of large language models, particularly ChatGPT, for comprehensive sentiment analysis of citations within scientific articles. By leveraging advanced natural language processing (NLP) techniques, ChatGPT can discern the nuanced positivity or negativity of citations, offering insights into the reception and impact of cited works. Furthermore, ChatGPT's capabilities extend to detecting potential biases and conflicts of interest in citations, enhancing the objectivity and reliability of scientific literature evaluation. This study showcases the transformative potential of artificial intelligence (AI)-powered tools in enhancing citation analysis and promoting integrity in scholarly research.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2024.

Builds on

3 of 24 references.

References · 3

  1. 2023Applying BERT and ChatGPT for Sentiment Analysis of Lyme Disease in Scientific Literaturecited by 26
  2. 2023Unlocking the Potential of ChatGPT: A Comprehensive Exploration of its Applications, Advantages, Limitations, and Future Directions in Natural Language Processingcited by 11
  3. 2023Analyzing the Performance of ChatGPT in Cardiology and Vascular Pathologiescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.