Collaborative human-AI trust (CHAI-T): A process framework for active management of trust in human-AI collaboration
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Collaborative human-AI (HAI) teaming combines the unique skills and capabilities of humans and machines in sustained teaming interactions leveraging the strengths of each. In tasks involving regular exposure to novelty and uncertainty, collaboration between adaptive, creative humans and powerful, precise artificial intelligence (AI) promises new solutions and efficiencies. User trust is essential to creating and maintaining these collaborative relationships. Established models of trust in traditional forms of AI typically recognize the contribution of three primary categories of trust antecedents: characteristics of the human user, characteristics of the technology, and environmental factors. The emergence of HAI teams, however, requires an understanding of human trust that accounts for the specificity of task contexts and goals, integrates processes of interaction, and captures how trust evolves in a teaming environment over time. Drawing on both the psychological and computer science literature, the process framework of trust in collaborative HAI teams (CHAI-T) presented in this paper adopts the tripartite structure of antecedents established by earlier models, while incorporating team processes and performance phases to capture the dynamism inherent to trust in teaming contexts. These features enable active management of trust in collaborative AI systems, with practical implications for the design and deployment of collaborative HAI teams.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 5.
9 papers.
- 2025Edge-Cloud Collaborative Computing on Distributed Intelligence and Model Optimization: A Surveycited by 13
- 2025Position: We Need Responsible, Application-Driven (RAD) AI Researchcited by 2
- 2026Augmenting Clinical Decision-Making with an Interactive and Interpretable AI Copilot: A Real-World User Study with Clinicians in Nephrology and Obstetricscited by 1
- 2026What Types of Human-AI Teams Exist?cited by 1
- 2025In Generative AI We (Dis)Trust? Computational Analysis of Trust and Distrust in Reddit Discussionscited by 0
- 2025Closing the Expression Gap in LLM Instructions via Socratic Questioningcited by 0
- 2026Bridging Pedagogy and Play: Introducing a Language Mapping Interface for Human-AI Co-Creation in Educational Game Designcited by 0
- 2026Engineering Signals of Human-AI Collaboration in the Agentic Coding Era: A Longitudinal Analysis of 33,228 Pull Requests from vLLM and SGLang with Implications for Biomedical AI Agents and Bioinformatics Pipeline Developmencited by 0
- 2026No Pixel Left Behind: Filling Gaps in Anime Colorizationcited by 0
- 2026No Pixel Left Behind: Filling Gaps in Anime Colorization1 Sep 2026
- 2026Engineering Signals of Human-AI Collaboration in the Agentic Coding Era: A Longitudinal Analysis of 33,228 Pull Requests from vLLM and SGLang with Implications for Biomedical AI Agents and Bioinformatics Pipeline Developmen14 Aug 2026
- 2026What Types of Human-AI Teams Exist?2 Jul 2026
- 2026Bridging Pedagogy and Play: Introducing a Language Mapping Interface for Human-AI Co-Creation in Educational Game Design4 Mar 2026
- 2026Augmenting Clinical Decision-Making with an Interactive and Interpretable AI Copilot: A Real-World User Study with Clinicians in Nephrology and Obstetrics31 Jan 2026
- 2025Closing the Expression Gap in LLM Instructions via Socratic Questioning31 Oct 2025
- 2025In Generative AI We (Dis)Trust? Computational Analysis of Trust and Distrust in Reddit Discussions17 Oct 2025
- 2025Position: We Need Responsible, Application-Driven (RAD) AI Research7 May 2025
- 2025Edge-Cloud Collaborative Computing on Distributed Intelligence and Model Optimization: A Survey3 May 2025