AMOR: Ambiguous Authorship Order
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As we all know, writing scientific papers together with our beloved colleagues is a truly remarkable experience (partially): endless discussions about the same useless paragraph over and over again, followed by long days and long nights -- both at the same time. What a wonderful ride it is! What a beautiful life we have. But wait, there's one tiny little problem that utterly shatters the peace, turning even renowned scientists into bloodthirsty monsters: author order. The reason is that, contrary to widespread opinion, it's not the font size that matters, but the way things are ordered. Of course, this is a fairly well-known fact among scientists all across the planet (and beyond) and explains clearly why we regularly have to read about yet another escalated paper submission in local police reports. In this paper, we take an important step backwards to tackle this issue by solving the so-called author ordering problem (AOP) once and for all. Specifically, we propose AMOR, a system that replaces silly constructs like co-first or co-middle authorship with a simple yet easy probabilistic approach based on random shuffling of the author list at viewing time. In addition to AOP, we also solve the ambiguous author ordering citation problem} (AAOCP) on the fly. Stop author violence, be human.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 8 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2024.
Builds on
1 of 8 references.
References · 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025NeuRaLaTeX: A machine learning library written in pure LaTeX31 Mar 2025