mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Conditional Pseudo-Reversible Normalizing Flow for Surrogate Modeling in Quantifying Uncertainty Propagation

arXiv 2404.00502 ↗First posted 31 Mar 2024cs.LG cs.NA math.NAcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce a conditional pseudo-reversible normalizing flow for constructing surrogate models of a physical model polluted by additive noise to efficiently quantify forward and inverse uncertainty propagation. Existing surrogate modeling approaches usually focus on approximating the deterministic component of physical model. However, this strategy necessitates knowledge of noise and resorts to auxiliary sampling methods for quantifying inverse uncertainty propagation. In this work, we develop the conditional pseudo-reversible normalizing flow model to directly learn and efficiently generate samples from the conditional probability density functions. The training process utilizes dataset consisting of input-output pairs without requiring prior knowledge about the noise and the function. Our model, once trained, can generate samples from any conditional probability density functions whose high probability regions are covered by the training set. Moreover, the pseudo-reversibility feature allows for the use of fully-connected neural network architectures, which simplifies the implementation and enables theoretical analysis. We provide a rigorous convergence analysis of the conditional pseudo-reversible normalizing flow model, showing its ability to converge to the target conditional probability density function using the Kullback-Leibler divergence. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our method, we apply it to several benchmark tests and a real-world geologic carbon storage problem.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2024.

Builds on

18 of 30 references.

References · 18

  1. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  2. 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,029
  3. 2016Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticianscited by 1,466
  4. 2019Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inferencecited by 1,315
  5. 2022Diffusion Models: A Comprehensive Survey of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,107
  6. 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 813
  7. 2017Masked Autoregressive Flow for Density Estimationcited by 680
  8. 2020Bayesian Deep Learning and a Probabilistic Perspective of Generalizationcited by 480
  9. 2020Hands-on Bayesian Neural Networks -- a Tutorial for Deep Learning Userscited by 336
  10. 2017Learning Discourse-level Diversity for Neural Dialog Models using Conditional Variational Autoencoderscited by 222
  11. 2022Uncertainty Quantification in Scientific Machine Learning: Methods, Metrics, and Comparisonscited by 169
  12. 2019HyperGAN: A Generative Model for Diverse, Performant Neural Networkscited by 51
6 more
  1. 2020Uncertainty-Aware Deep Classifiers using Generative Modelscited by 41
  2. 2020Solving inverse problems using conditional invertible neural networkscited by 37
  3. 2021Normalizing field flows: Solving forward and inverse stochastic differential equations using physics-informed flow modelscited by 34
  4. 2020Uncertainty quantification in medical image segmentation with normalizing flowscited by 23
  5. 2019Uncertainty Quantification with Generative Modelscited by 17
  6. 2023Learning to solve Bayesian inverse problems: An amortized variational inference approach using Gaussian and Flow guidescited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

3 papers.