mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PLoc: A New Evaluation Criterion Based on Physical Location for Autonomous Driving Datasets

arXiv 2403.19893 ↗First posted 29 Mar 2024cs.CVcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Autonomous driving has garnered significant attention as a key research area within artificial intelligence. In the context of autonomous driving scenarios, the varying physical locations of objects correspond to different levels of danger. However, conventional evaluation criteria for automatic driving object detection often overlook the crucial aspect of an object's physical location, leading to evaluation results that may not accurately reflect the genuine threat posed by the object to the autonomous driving vehicle. To enhance the safety of autonomous driving, this paper introduces a novel evaluation criterion based on physical location information, termed PLoc. This criterion transcends the limitations of traditional criteria by acknowledging that the physical location of pedestrians in autonomous driving scenarios can provide valuable safety-related information. Furthermore, this paper presents a newly re-annotated dataset (ApolloScape-R) derived from ApolloScape. ApolloScape-R involves the relabeling of pedestrians based on the significance of their physical location. The dataset is utilized to assess the performance of various object detection models under the proposed PLoc criterion. Experimental results demonstrate that the average accuracy of all object detection models in identifying a person situated in the travel lane of an autonomous vehicle is lower than that for a person on a sidewalk. The dataset is publicly available at https://github.com/lnyrlyed/ApolloScape-R.git

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Mar 2024.

Builds on

23 of 41 references.

References · 23

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  3. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
  4. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
  5. 2015SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detectorcited by 3,125
  6. 2015Fast R-CNNcited by 2,930
  7. 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,652
  8. 2013Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentationcited by 2,160
  9. 2020YOLOv4: Optimal Speed and Accuracy of Object Detectioncited by 1,624
  10. 2019FCOS: Fully Convolutional One-Stage Object Detectioncited by 1,573
  11. 2018BDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset for Heterogeneous Multitask Learningcited by 1,282
  12. 2021YOLOX: Exceeding YOLO Series in 2021cited by 1,064
11 more
  1. 2022YOLOv7: Trainable bag-of-freebies sets new state-of-the-art for real-time object detectorscited by 978
  2. 2019Bridging the Gap Between Anchor-based and Anchor-free Detection via Adaptive Training Sample Selectioncited by 539
  3. 2020Sparse R-CNN: End-to-End Object Detection with Learnable Proposalscited by 494
  4. 2019Cascade R-CNN: High Quality Object Detection and Instance Segmentationcited by 428
  5. 2019RepPoints: Point Set Representation for Object Detectioncited by 264
  6. 2023Dense Distinct Query for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 76
  7. 2021SODA10M: A Large-Scale 2D Self/Semi-Supervised Object Detection Dataset for Autonomous Drivingcited by 43
  8. 2020Out-of-Distribution Detection for Automotive Perceptioncited by 37
  9. 2018Revisiting RCNN: On Awakening the Classification Power of Faster RCNNcited by 28
  10. 2017Face Detection using Deep Learning: An Improved Faster RCNN Approachcited by 16
  11. 2020Road Curb Detection and Localization with Monocular Forward-view Vehicle Cameracited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4.

4 papers.