Detecting Financial Bots on the Ethereum Blockchain
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The integration of bots in Distributed Ledger Technologies (DLTs) fosters efficiency and automation. However, their use is also associated with predatory trading and market manipulation, and can pose threats to system integrity. It is therefore essential to understand the extent of bot deployment in DLTs; despite this, current detection systems are predominantly rule-based and lack flexibility. In this study, we present a novel approach that utilizes machine learning for the detection of financial bots on the Ethereum platform. First, we systematize existing scientific literature and collect anecdotal evidence to establish a taxonomy for financial bots, comprising 7 categories and 24 subcategories. Next, we create a ground-truth dataset consisting of 133 human and 137 bot addresses. Third, we employ both unsupervised and supervised machine learning algorithms to detect bots deployed on Ethereum. The highest-performing clustering algorithm is a Gaussian Mixture Model with an average cluster purity of 82.6%, while the highest-performing model for binary classification is a Random Forest with an accuracy of 83%. Our machine learning-based detection mechanism contributes to understanding the Ethereum ecosystem dynamics by providing additional insights into the current bot landscape.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Mar 2024.
Builds on
15 of 52 references.
References · 15
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,898
- 2021Non-Fungible Token (NFT): Overview, Evaluation, Opportunities and Challengescited by 25
- 2021SoK: Decentralized Finance (DeFi)cited by 23
- 2021Quantifying Blockchain Extractable Value: How dark is the forest?cited by 15
- 2019SoK: Transparent Dishonesty: front-running attacks on Blockchaincited by 9
- 2021An Empirical Study of DeFi Liquidations: Incentives, Risks, and Instabilitiescited by 8
- 2021Frontrunner Jones and the Raiders of the Dark Forest: An Empirical Study of Frontrunning on the Ethereum Blockchaincited by 7
- 2021When are Deep Networks really better than Decision Forests at small sample sizes, and how?cited by 6
- 2021Cyclic Arbitrage in Decentralized Exchangescited by 4
- 2022Extracting Godl [sic] from the Salt Mines: Ethereum Miners Extracting Valuecited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 5.
6 papers.
- 2026How Agentic Is Agentic Commerce? A Population-Scale Measurement of x402 Adoption and Authenticitycited by 2
- 2025Decoding RWA Tokenized U.S. Treasuries: Functional Dissection and Address Role Inferencecited by 0
- 2026Modeling Decisions in Blockchain Analytics: A Leakage-Aware Evaluation of Tree-Based vs. Sequential Modelscited by 0
- 2026Compression-Based Behavioral Similarity for Open-World Sybil Discovery on Ethereumcited by 0
- 2026Discovering Persistent Behavioural Patterns for Interpretable Blockchain Forensicscited by 0
- 2026If It Walks Like an Arbitrage: Protocol-Agnostic Detection with Decidable Structural Equivalencecited by 0
- 2026Discovering Persistent Behavioural Patterns for Interpretable Blockchain Forensics13 Aug 2026
- 2026Compression-Based Behavioral Similarity for Open-World Sybil Discovery on Ethereum29 Jul 2026
- 2026Modeling Decisions in Blockchain Analytics: A Leakage-Aware Evaluation of Tree-Based vs. Sequential Models29 Jul 2026
- 2026How Agentic Is Agentic Commerce? A Population-Scale Measurement of x402 Adoption and Authenticity14 Jul 2026
- 2026If It Walks Like an Arbitrage: Protocol-Agnostic Detection with Decidable Structural Equivalence26 Jun 2026
- 2025Decoding RWA Tokenized U.S. Treasuries: Functional Dissection and Address Role Inference20 Jul 2025