Projective Methods for Mitigating Gender Bias in Pre-trained Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Mitigation of gender bias in NLP has a long history tied to debiasing static word embeddings. More recently, attention has shifted to debiasing pre-trained language models. We study to what extent the simplest projective debiasing methods, developed for word embeddings, can help when applied to BERT's internal representations. Projective methods are fast to implement, use a small number of saved parameters, and make no updates to the existing model parameters. We evaluate the efficacy of the methods in reducing both intrinsic bias, as measured by BERT's next sentence prediction task, and in mitigating observed bias in a downstream setting when fine-tuned. To this end, we also provide a critical analysis of a popular gender-bias assessment test for quantifying intrinsic bias, resulting in an enhanced test set and new bias measures. We find that projective methods can be effective at both intrinsic bias and downstream bias mitigation, but that the two outcomes are not necessarily correlated. This finding serves as a warning that intrinsic bias test sets, based either on language modeling tasks or next sentence prediction, should not be the only benchmark in developing a debiased language model.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Mar 2024.
Builds on
23 of 41 references.
References · 23
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
- 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,837
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
- 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 951
- 2020StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language modelscited by 911
- 2023A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivitycited by 888
- 2020CrowS-Pairs: A Challenge Dataset for Measuring Social Biases in Masked Language Modelscited by 703
- 2019On Measuring Social Biases in Sentence Encoderscited by 397
- 2019Mitigating Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing: Literature Reviewcited by 287
- 2019Measuring Bias in Contextualized Word Representationscited by 275
11 more
- 2018Learning Gender-Neutral Word Embeddingscited by 169
- 2020Intrinsic Bias Metrics Do Not Correlate with Application Biascited by 148
- 2019On Measuring and Mitigating Biased Inferences of Word Embeddingscited by 112
- 2019Recent Advances in Natural Language Inference: A Survey of Benchmarks, Resources, and Approachescited by 64
- 2023Are ChatGPT and GPT-4 General-Purpose Solvers for Financial Text Analytics? A Study on Several Typical Taskscited by 59
- 2021Can NLI Models Verify QA Systems' Predictions?cited by 46
- 2020Evaluating Semantic Accuracy of Data-to-Text Generation with Natural Language Inferencecited by 43
- 2020Investigating Gender Bias in BERTcited by 40
- 2019A General Framework for Implicit and Explicit Debiasing of Distributional Word Vector Spacescited by 36
- 2021Marked Attribute Bias in Natural Language Inferencecited by 6
- 2020Sequential Neural Networks for Noetic End-to-End Response Selectioncited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.