An Exploratory Study on Upper-Level Computing Students' Use of Large Language Models as Tools in a Semester-Long Project
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Background: Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT and CoPilot are influencing software engineering practice. Software engineering educators must teach future software engineers how to use such tools well. As of yet, there have been few studies that report on the use of LLMs in the classroom. It is, therefore, important to evaluate students' perception of LLMs and possible ways of adapting the computing curriculum to these shifting paradigms. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to explore computing students' experiences and approaches to using LLMs during a semester-long software engineering project. Design/Method: We collected data from a senior-level software engineering course at Purdue University. This course uses a project-based learning (PBL) design. The students used LLMs such as ChatGPT and Copilot in their projects. A sample of these student teams were interviewed to understand (1) how they used LLMs in their projects; and (2) whether and how their perspectives on LLMs changed over the course of the semester. We analyzed the data to identify themes related to students' usage patterns and learning outcomes. Results/Discussion: When computing students utilize LLMs within a project, their use cases cover both technical and professional applications. In addition, these students perceive LLMs to be efficient tools in obtaining information and completion of tasks. However, there were concerns about the responsible use of LLMs without being detrimental to their own learning outcomes. Based on our findings, we recommend future research to investigate the usage of LLM's in lower-level computer engineering courses to understand whether and how LLMs can be integrated as a learning aid without hurting the learning outcomes.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Mar 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 3.
6 papers.
- 2024Beyond the Hype: A Comprehensive Review of Current Trends in Generative AI Research, Teaching Practices, and Toolscited by 14
- 2024Large Language Models in Computer Science Education: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 12
- 2025LLMs' Reshaping of People, Processes, Products, and Society in Software Development: A Comprehensive Exploration with Early Adopterscited by 8
- 2025Human-AI Experience in Integrated Development Environments: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 5
- 2025The Lazy Student's Dream: ChatGPT Passing an Engineering Course on Its Owncited by 2
- 2024The why, what, and how of AI-based coding in scientific researchcited by 0
- 2025Human-AI Experience in Integrated Development Environments: A Systematic Literature Review8 Mar 2025
- 2025LLMs' Reshaping of People, Processes, Products, and Society in Software Development: A Comprehensive Exploration with Early Adopters6 Mar 2025
- 2025The Lazy Student's Dream: ChatGPT Passing an Engineering Course on Its Own23 Feb 2025
- 2024Beyond the Hype: A Comprehensive Review of Current Trends in Generative AI Research, Teaching Practices, and Tools19 Dec 2024
- 2024Large Language Models in Computer Science Education: A Systematic Literature Review21 Oct 2024
- 2024The why, what, and how of AI-based coding in scientific research3 Oct 2024