On Optimizing Hyperparameters for Quantum Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The increasing capabilities of Machine Learning (ML) models go hand in hand with an immense amount of data and computational power required for training. Therefore, training is usually outsourced into HPC facilities, where we have started to experience limits in scaling conventional HPC hardware, as theorized by Moore's law. Despite heavy parallelization and optimization efforts, current state-of-the-art ML models require weeks for training, which is associated with an enormous CO2 footprint. Quantum Computing, and specifically Quantum Machine Learning (QML), can offer significant theoretical speed-ups and enhanced expressive power. However, training QML models requires tuning various hyperparameters, which is a nontrivial task and suboptimal choices can highly affect the trainability and performance of the models. In this study, we identify the most impactful hyperparameters and collect data about the performance of QML models. We compare different configurations and provide researchers with performance data and concrete suggestions for hyperparameter selection.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Mar 2024.
Builds on
21 of 64 references.
References · 21
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2020Variational Quantum Algorithmscited by 687
- 2018Supervised learning with quantum enhanced feature spacescited by 654
- 2018Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapescited by 624
- 2020The effect of data encoding on the expressive power of variational quantum machine learning modelscited by 328
- 2020Noise-Induced Barren Plateaus in Variational Quantum Algorithmscited by 192
- 2021Connecting ansatz expressibility to gradient magnitudes and barren plateauscited by 180
- 2020Entanglement Induced Barren Plateauscited by 101
- 2024Better than classical? The subtle art of benchmarking quantum machine learning modelscited by 82
- 2019Learning to learn with quantum neural networks via classical neural networkscited by 55
- 2020Universal Approximation Property of Quantum Machine Learning Models in Quantum-Enhanced Feature Spacescited by 44
- 2022Escaping from the Barren Plateau via Gaussian Initializations in Deep Variational Quantum Circuitscited by 42
9 more
- 2022BEINIT: Avoiding Barren Plateaus in Variational Quantum Algorithmscited by 15
- 2022Near-Term Quantum Computing Techniques: Variational Quantum Algorithms, Error Mitigation, Circuit Compilation, Benchmarking and Classical Simulationcited by 13
- 2023Disentangling Hype from Practicality: On Realistically Achieving Quantum Advantagecited by 8
- 2022Towards AutoQML: A Cloud-Based Automated Circuit Architecture Search Frameworkcited by 7
- 2022Hyperparameter Importance of Quantum Neural Networks Across Small Datasetscited by 7
- 2022A preprocessing perspective for quantum machine learning classification advantage using NISQ algorithmscited by 7
- 2021Evaluating the Performance of Some Local Optimizers for Variational Quantum Classifierscited by 3
- 2022Quantum Machine Learning Applied to the Classification of Diabetescited by 2
- 2020Quantum speedups of some general-purpose numerical optimisation algorithmscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.