Multi-Label Adaptive Batch Selection by Highlighting Hard and Imbalanced Samples
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep neural network models have demonstrated their effectiveness in classifying multi-label data from various domains. Typically, they employ a training mode that combines mini-batches with optimizers, where each sample is randomly selected with equal probability when constructing mini-batches. However, the intrinsic class imbalance in multi-label data may bias the model towards majority labels, since samples relevant to minority labels may be underrepresented in each mini-batch. Meanwhile, during the training process, we observe that instances associated with minority labels tend to induce greater losses. Existing heuristic batch selection methods, such as priority selection of samples with high contribution to the objective function, i.e., samples with high loss, have been proven to accelerate convergence while reducing the loss and test error in single-label data. However, batch selection methods have not yet been applied and validated in multi-label data. In this study, we introduce a simple yet effective adaptive batch selection algorithm tailored to multi-label deep learning models. It adaptively selects each batch by prioritizing hard samples related to minority labels. A variant of our method also takes informative label correlations into consideration. Comprehensive experiments combining five multi-label deep learning models on thirteen benchmark datasets show that our method converges faster and performs better than random batch selection.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Mar 2024.
Builds on
12 of 39 references.
References · 12
- 2016Training Region-based Object Detectors with Online Hard Example Miningcited by 577
- 2021Deep Long-Tailed Learning: A Surveycited by 416
- 2020Asymmetric Loss For Multi-Label Classificationcited by 379
- 2018Not All Samples Are Created Equal: Deep Learning with Importance Samplingcited by 323
- 2017Active Bias: Training More Accurate Neural Networks by Emphasizing High Variance Samplescited by 147
- 2015Online Batch Selection for Faster Training of Neural Networkscited by 121
- 2015Should we really use post-hoc tests based on mean-ranks?cited by 116
- 2022Hard Sample Aware Network for Contrastive Deep Graph Clusteringcited by 61
- 2020Disentangled Variational Autoencoder based Multi-Label Classification with Covariance-Aware Multivariate Probit Modelcited by 22
- 2019Carpe Diem, Seize the Samples Uncertain "At the Moment" for Adaptive Batch Selectioncited by 10
- 2020Multi-Label Sampling based on Local Label Imbalancecited by 10
- 2018Making Classifier Chains Resilient to Class Imbalancecited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 3.
5 papers.
- 2024Active Data Curation Effectively Distills Large-Scale Multimodal Modelscited by 19
- 2024Batch Selection for Multi-Label Classification Guided by Uncertainty and Dynamic Label Correlationscited by 4
- 2026D2ACE: Multi-Label Batch Selection Guided by Dual Dynamics and Adaptive Correlation Enhancementcited by 0
- 2026Addressing Imbalance in Multi-Label Data via Label-Specific Distance-based Oversamplingcited by 0
- 2026Self-Explainable Multi-Label Graph Neural Network for Correlated Evidence Attributioncited by 0
- 2026Self-Explainable Multi-Label Graph Neural Network for Correlated Evidence Attribution27 Aug 2026
- 2026Addressing Imbalance in Multi-Label Data via Label-Specific Distance-based Oversampling4 Jun 2026
- 2026D2ACE: Multi-Label Batch Selection Guided by Dual Dynamics and Adaptive Correlation Enhancement10 May 2026
- 2024Batch Selection for Multi-Label Classification Guided by Uncertainty and Dynamic Label Correlations21 Dec 2024
- 2024Active Data Curation Effectively Distills Large-Scale Multimodal Models27 Nov 2024