Uncertainty Quantification for Gradient-based Explanations in Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Explanation methods help understand the reasons for a model's prediction. These methods are increasingly involved in model debugging, performance optimization, and gaining insights into the workings of a model. With such critical applications of these methods, it is imperative to measure the uncertainty associated with the explanations generated by these methods. In this paper, we propose a pipeline to ascertain the explanation uncertainty of neural networks by combining uncertainty estimation methods and explanation methods. We use this pipeline to produce explanation distributions for the CIFAR-10, FER+, and California Housing datasets. By computing the coefficient of variation of these distributions, we evaluate the confidence in the explanation and determine that the explanations generated using Guided Backpropagation have low uncertainty associated with them. Additionally, we compute modified pixel insertion/deletion metrics to evaluate the quality of the generated explanations.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Mar 2024.
Builds on
13 of 22 references.
References · 13
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,436
- 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 990
- 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 838
- 2016Training Deep Networks for Facial Expression Recognition with Crowd-Sourced Label Distributioncited by 158
- 2018Flipout: Efficient Pseudo-Independent Weight Perturbations on Mini-Batchescited by 133
- 2020Reliable Post hoc Explanations: Modeling Uncertainty in Explainabilitycited by 125
- 2019DropConnect Is Effective in Modeling Uncertainty of Bayesian Deep Networkscited by 92
- 2022A Deeper Look into Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty Disentanglementcited by 87
1 more
- 2021Explaining Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 18
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026No Single Metric Tells the Whole Story: A Multi-Dimensional Evaluation Framework for Uncertainty Attributionscited by 0
- 2026Post-Hoc Uncertainty-Aware Explanations for Deployed Power Quality Disturbance Classifiers via Laplace Approximationcited by 0
- 2026ConformaDecompose: Explaining Uncertainty via Calibration Localizationcited by 0
- 2026A Unified Framework for Uncertainty-Aware Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Case Study in Power Quality Disturbance Classificationcited by 0
- 2026Signal or Noise? Auditing Rotation-Induced Saliency Drift in Medical and Aerial Imagingcited by 0
- 2026Signal or Noise? Auditing Rotation-Induced Saliency Drift in Medical and Aerial Imaging2 Sep 2026
- 2026A Unified Framework for Uncertainty-Aware Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Case Study in Power Quality Disturbance Classification20 May 2026
- 2026ConformaDecompose: Explaining Uncertainty via Calibration Localization29 Apr 2026
- 2026Post-Hoc Uncertainty-Aware Explanations for Deployed Power Quality Disturbance Classifiers via Laplace Approximation15 Apr 2026
- 2026No Single Metric Tells the Whole Story: A Multi-Dimensional Evaluation Framework for Uncertainty Attributions25 Mar 2026