mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Certified Machine Unlearning via Noisy Stochastic Gradient Descent

arXiv 2403.17105 ↗First posted 25 Mar 2024cs.LG cs.CRcited by 13

On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning

Abstract (arXiv)

``The right to be forgotten'' ensured by laws for user data privacy becomes increasingly important. Machine unlearning aims to efficiently remove the effect of certain data points on the trained model parameters so that it can be approximately the same as if one retrains the model from scratch. We propose to leverage projected noisy stochastic gradient descent for unlearning and establish its first approximate unlearning guarantee under the convexity assumption. Our approach exhibits several benefits, including provable complexity saving compared to retraining, and supporting sequential and batch unlearning. Both of these benefits are closely related to our new results on the infinite Wasserstein distance tracking of the adjacent (un)learning processes. Extensive experiments show that our approach achieves a similar utility under the same privacy constraint while using 2% and 10% of the gradient computations compared with the state-of-the-art gradient-based approximate unlearning methods for mini-batch and full-batch settings, respectively.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 26 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Mar 2024.

Builds on

26 of 39 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Langevin Unlearning: A New Perspective of Noisy Gradient Descent for Machine Unlearning18 Jan
  2. 2023From Adaptive Query Release to Machine Unlearning20 Jul
  3. 2022Forget Unlearning: Towards True Data-Deletion in Machine Learning17 Oct
  4. 2021Adaptive Machine Unlearning8 Jun
  5. 2021Remember What You Want to Forget: Algorithms for Machine Unlearning4 Mar
  6. 2021Machine Unlearning via Algorithmic Stability25 Feb

Other references · 20

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  4. 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,020
  5. 2018The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networkscited by 847
  6. 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 643
  7. 2019Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning Modelscited by 512
  8. 2021Opacus: User-Friendly Differential Privacy Library in PyTorchcited by 375
  9. 2020Descent-to-Delete: Gradient-Based Methods for Machine Unlearningcited by 303
  10. 2018Privacy Amplification by Subsampling: Tight Analyses via Couplings and Divergencescited by 237
  11. 2019Rapid Convergence of the Unadjusted Langevin Algorithm: Isoperimetry Sufficescited by 224
  12. 2021Practical and Private (Deep) Learning without Sampling or Shufflingcited by 169
8 more
  1. 2018Privacy Amplification by Iterationcited by 97
  2. 2021Differential Privacy Dynamics of Langevin Diffusion and Noisy Gradient Descentcited by 71
  3. 2022Privacy of Noisy Stochastic Gradient Descent: More Iterations without More Privacy Losscited by 60
  4. 2022Differentially Private Learning Needs Hidden State (Or Much Faster Convergence)cited by 45
  5. 2020Faster Differentially Private Samplers via R'enyi Divergence Analysis of Discretized Langevin MCMCcited by 27
  6. 2022Resolving the Mixing Time of the Langevin Algorithm to its Stationary Distribution for Log-Concave Samplingcited by 21
  7. 2023Do SSL Models Have D'ej`a Vu? A Case of Unintended Memorization in Self-supervised Learningcited by 19
  8. 2022Differential Privacy Guarantees for Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamicscited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 9; 2026: 2.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: