mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Little Leak Will Sink a Great Ship: Survey of Transparency for Large Language Models from Start to Finish

arXiv 2403.16139 ↗First posted 24 Mar 2024cs.CLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) are trained on massive web-crawled corpora. This poses risks of leakage, including personal information, copyrighted texts, and benchmark datasets. Such leakage leads to undermining human trust in AI due to potential unauthorized generation of content or overestimation of performance. We establish the following three criteria concerning the leakage issues: (1) leakage rate: the proportion of leaked data in training data, (2) output rate: the ease of generating leaked data, and (3) detection rate: the detection performance of leaked versus non-leaked data. Despite the leakage rate being the origin of data leakage issues, it is not understood how it affects the output rate and detection rate. In this paper, we conduct an experimental survey to elucidate the relationship between the leakage rate and both the output rate and detection rate for personal information, copyrighted texts, and benchmark data. Additionally, we propose a self-detection approach that uses few-shot learning in which LLMs detect whether instances are present or absent in their training data, in contrast to previous methods that do not employ explicit learning. To explore the ease of generating leaked information, we create a dataset of prompts designed to elicit personal information, copyrighted text, and benchmarks from LLMs. Our experiments reveal that LLMs produce leaked information in most cases despite less such data in their training set. This indicates even small amounts of leaked data can greatly affect outputs. Our self-detection method showed superior performance compared to existing detection methods.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2024.

Builds on

35 of 41 references.

References · 35

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  4. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  5. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  6. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  7. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
  8. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
  9. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,576
  10. 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,512
  11. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
  12. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
23 more
  1. 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,786
  2. 2023The RefinedWeb Dataset for Falcon LLM: Outperforming Curated Corpora with Web Data, and Web Data Onlycited by 763
  3. 2024OLMo: Accelerating the Science of Language Modelscited by 613
  4. 2023The Falcon Series of Open Language Modelscited by 535
  5. 2024Dolma: an Open Corpus of Three Trillion Tokens for Language Model Pretraining Researchcited by 483
  6. 2023Scalable Extraction of Training Data from (Production) Language Modelscited by 434
  7. 2023Detecting Pretraining Data from Large Language Modelscited by 387
  8. 2023Who's Harry Potter? Approximate Unlearning in LLMscited by 381
  9. 2022Are Large Pre-Trained Language Models Leaking Your Personal Information?cited by 200
  10. 2023Don't Make Your LLM an Evaluation Benchmark Cheatercited by 194
  11. 2023Do-Not-Answer: A Dataset for Evaluating Safeguards in LLMscited by 184
  12. 2023A Pretrainer's Guide to Training Data: Measuring the Effects of Data Age, Domain Coverage, Quality, & Toxicitycited by 182
  13. 2023Beyond Memorization: Violating Privacy Via Inference with Large Language Modelscited by 175
  14. 2023ProPILE: Probing Privacy Leakage in Large Language Modelscited by 129
  15. 2023Copyright Violations and Large Language Modelscited by 108
  16. 2023Practical Membership Inference Attacks against Fine-tuned Large Language Models via Self-prompt Calibrationcited by 98
  17. 2023OUTFOX: LLM-Generated Essay Detection Through In-Context Learning with Adversarially Generated Examplescited by 80
  18. 2024Evaluating Gender Bias in Large Language Models via Chain-of-Thought Promptingcited by 50
  19. 2024Likelihood-based Mitigation of Evaluation Bias in Large Language Modelscited by 9
  20. 2023Solving NLP Problems through Human-System Collaboration: A Discussion-based Approachcited by 5
  21. 2023Reducing Sequence Length by Predicting Edit Operations with Large Language Modelscited by 5
  22. 2023SAIE Framework: Support Alone Isn't Enough -- Advancing LLM Training with Adversarial Remarkscited by 4
  23. 2024Eagle: Ethical Dataset Given from Real Interactionscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

6 papers.