Fast and Unified Path Gradient Estimators for Normalizing Flows
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent work shows that path gradient estimators for normalizing flows have lower variance compared to standard estimators for variational inference, resulting in improved training. However, they are often prohibitively more expensive from a computational point of view and cannot be applied to maximum likelihood training in a scalable manner, which severely hinders their widespread adoption. In this work, we overcome these crucial limitations. Specifically, we propose a fast path gradient estimator which improves computational efficiency significantly and works for all normalizing flow architectures of practical relevance. We then show that this estimator can also be applied to maximum likelihood training for which it has a regularizing effect as it can take the form of a given target energy function into account. We empirically establish its superior performance and reduced variance for several natural sciences applications.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Mar 2024.
Builds on
32 of 44 references.
References · 32
- 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,779
- 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,042
- 2019Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inferencecited by 1,323
- 2014NICE: Non-linear Independent Components Estimationcited by 1,058
- 2019Neural Spline Flowscited by 596
- 2015Importance Weighted Autoencoderscited by 456
- 2019Monte Carlo Gradient Estimation in Machine Learningcited by 283
- 2017The Reversible Residual Network: Backpropagation Without Storing Activationscited by 217
- 2018Neural Autoregressive Flowscited by 208
- 2019Flow-based generative models for Markov chain Monte Carlo in lattice field theorycited by 148
- 2020Normalizing Flows on Tori and Spherescited by 117
- 2020Equivariant flow-based sampling for lattice gauge theorycited by 103
20 more
- 2017Sticking the Landing: Simple, Lower-Variance Gradient Estimators for Variational Inferencecited by 98
- 2020Augmented Normalizing Flows: Bridging the Gap Between Generative Flows and Latent Variable Modelscited by 66
- 2022Continual Repeated Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlocited by 66
- 2019Sum-of-Squares Polynomial Flowcited by 62
- 2021Smooth Normalizing Flowscited by 53
- 2018Doubly Reparameterized Gradient Estimators for Monte Carlo Objectivescited by 41
- 2020Advances in Black-Box VI: Normalizing Flows, Importance Weighting, and Optimizationcited by 37
- 2023SE(3) Equivariant Augmented Coupling Flowscited by 37
- 2018Pathwise Derivatives Beyond the Reparameterization Trickcited by 36
- 2021Introduction to Normalizing Flows for Lattice Field Theorycited by 35
- 2021Challenges and Opportunities in High-dimensional Variational Inferencecited by 35
- 2017Reducing Reparameterization Gradient Variancecited by 27
- 2023Detecting and Mitigating Mode-Collapse for Flow-based Sampling of Lattice Field Theoriescited by 25
- 2022Gradients should stay on Path: Better Estimators of the Reverse- and Forward KL Divergence for Normalizing Flowscited by 23
- 2023Advances in machine-learning-based sampling motivated by lattice quantum chromodynamicscited by 23
- 2020On the Difficulty of Unbiased Alpha Divergence Minimizationcited by 21
- 2021Generalized Doubly Reparameterized Gradient Estimatorscited by 14
- 2021A unified view of likelihood ratio and reparameterization gradientscited by 12
- 2022Path-Gradient Estimators for Continuous Normalizing Flowscited by 11
- 2021Empirical Evaluation of Biased Methods for Alpha Divergence Minimizationcited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2024Disentangling impact of capacity, objective, batchsize, estimators, and step-size on flow VIcited by 5
- 2025Path Gradients after Flow Matchingcited by 3
- 2026Efficient Training of Boltzmann Generators Using Off-Policy Log-Dispersion Regularizationcited by 3
- 2025SESaMo: Symmetry-Enforcing Stochastic Modulation for Normalizing Flowscited by 2
- 2026How I learned to stop worrying and love StopGrads: Stationarity, Convergence, and a case study on Flow Map Learningcited by 0
- 2026How I learned to stop worrying and love StopGrads: Stationarity, Convergence, and a case study on Flow Map Learning14 Sep 2026
- 2026Efficient Training of Boltzmann Generators Using Off-Policy Log-Dispersion Regularization3 Feb 2026
- 2025SESaMo: Symmetry-Enforcing Stochastic Modulation for Normalizing Flows26 May 2025
- 2025Path Gradients after Flow Matching15 May 2025
- 2024Disentangling impact of capacity, objective, batchsize, estimators, and step-size on flow VI11 Dec 2024