Data-centric Prediction Explanation via Kernelized Stein Discrepancy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Existing example-based prediction explanation methods often bridge test and training data points through the model's parameters or latent representations. While these methods offer clues to the causes of model predictions, they often exhibit innate shortcomings, such as incurring significant computational overhead or producing coarse-grained explanations. This paper presents a Highly-precise and Data-centric Explan}ation (HD-Explain) prediction explanation method that exploits properties of Kernelized Stein Discrepancy (KSD). Specifically, the KSD uniquely defines a parameterized kernel function for a trained model that encodes model-dependent data correlation. By leveraging the kernel function, one can identify training samples that provide the best predictive support to a test point efficiently. We conducted thorough analyses and experiments across multiple classification domains, where we show that HD-Explain outperforms existing methods from various aspects, including 1) preciseness (fine-grained explanation), 2) consistency, and 3) computation efficiency, leading to a surprisingly simple, effective, and robust prediction explanation solution.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Mar 2024.
Builds on
19 of 36 references.
References · 19
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
- 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 580
- 2016Stein Variational Gradient Descent: A General Purpose Bayesian Inference Algorithmcited by 507
- 2023TRAK: Attributing Model Behavior at Scalecited by 283
- 2016A Kernelized Stein Discrepancy for Goodness-of-fit Tests and Model Evaluationcited by 236
- 2017Distilling a Neural Network Into a Soft Decision Treecited by 236
- 2018Representer Point Selection for Explaining Deep Neural Networkscited by 187
- 2022If Influence Functions are the Answer, Then What is the Question?cited by 144
- 2016A Kernel Test of Goodness of Fitcited by 143
- 2021Scaling Up Influence Functionscited by 132
- 2019Minimum Stein Discrepancy Estimatorscited by 57
7 more
- 2021Kernel Stein Discrepancy Descentcited by 57
- 2021HYDRA: Hypergradient Data Relevance Analysis for Interpreting Deep Neural Networkscited by 38
- 2020Stochastic Stein Discrepanciescited by 30
- 2020Explaining and Improving Model Behavior with k Nearest Neighbor Representationscited by 27
- 2020Testing Goodness of Fit of Conditional Density Models with Kernelscited by 19
- 2022Adapting and Evaluating Influence-Estimation Methods for Gradient-Boosted Decision Treescited by 16
- 2023Sample based Explanations via Generalized Representerscited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2024Nystr"om Kernel Stein Discrepancycited by 4
- 2025The Minimax Lower Bound of Kernel Stein Discrepancy Estimationcited by 3
- 2026Minimax Lower Bounds of Kernel Discrepancy Estimation: MMD, HSIC, KSDcited by 2
- 2026Minimax Lower Bounds of Kernel Discrepancy Estimation: MMD, HSIC, KSD27 Jul 2026
- 2025The Minimax Lower Bound of Kernel Stein Discrepancy Estimation16 Oct 2025
- 2024Nystr"om Kernel Stein Discrepancy12 Jun 2024