Apriori Knowledge in an Era of Computational Opacity: The Role of AI in Mathematical Discovery
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Can we acquire apriori knowledge of mathematical facts from the outputs of computer programs? People like Burge have argued (correctly in our opinion) that, for example, Appel and Haken acquired apriori knowledge of the Four Color Theorem from their computer program insofar as their program simply automated human forms of mathematical reasoning. However, unlike such programs, we argue that the opacity of modern LLMs and DNNs creates obstacles in obtaining apriori mathematical knowledge from them in similar ways. We claim though that if a proof-checker automating human forms of proof-checking is attached to such machines, then we can obtain apriori mathematical knowledge from them after all, even though the original machines are entirely opaque to us and the proofs they output may not, themselves, be human-surveyable.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Mar 2024.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025AI Mathematician as a Partner in Advancing Mathematical Discovery -- A Case Study in Homogenization Theory
- 2026Artificial Intelligence for Mathematical Reasoning: An Integrated Survey of Language Models, Neuro-symbolic Systems, and Verified Discovery
- 2026Measuring Progress in Reasoning Toward Mathematical Discovery with Automatic Verification
- 2024Mathematics and Machine Creativity: A Survey on Bridging Mathematics with AI
- 2024Formal Mathematical Reasoning: A New Frontier in AI
- 2026The Agentic Researcher: A Practical Guide to AI-Assisted Research in Mathematics and Machine Learning
- 2026Self-Supervised Theorem Discovery in a Formal Axiomatic System
- 2025Thinking Machines: Mathematical Reasoning in the Age of LLMs