mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SyllabusQA: A Course Logistics Question Answering Dataset

arXiv 2403.14666 ↗First posted 3 Mar 2024cs.CY cs.CL cs.IRcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automated teaching assistants and chatbots have significant potential to reduce the workload of human instructors, especially for logistics-related question answering, which is important to students yet repetitive for instructors. However, due to privacy concerns, there is a lack of publicly available datasets. We introduce SyllabusQA, an open-source dataset with 63 real course syllabi covering 36 majors, containing 5,078 open-ended course logistics-related question-answer pairs that are diverse in both question types and answer formats. Since many logistics-related questions contain critical information like the date of an exam, it is important to evaluate the factuality of answers. We benchmark several strong baselines on this task, from large language model prompting to retrieval-augmented generation. We introduce Fact-QA, an LLM-based (GPT-4) evaluation metric to evaluate the factuality of predicted answers. We find that despite performing close to humans on traditional metrics of textual similarity, there remains a significant gap between automated approaches and humans in terms of fact precision.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2024.

Builds on

14 of 33 references.

References · 14

  1. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  2. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
  3. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
  4. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
  5. 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,114
  6. 2023FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generationcited by 1,259
  7. 2017The NarrativeQA Reading Comprehension Challengecited by 590
  8. 2018QuAC : Question Answering in Contextcited by 379
  9. 2016NewsQA: A Machine Comprehension Datasetcited by 330
  10. 2023Fine-tuning Language Models for Factualitycited by 219
  11. 2015The Goldilocks Principle: Reading Children's Books with Explicit Memory Representationscited by 108
  12. 2022Fantastic Questions and Where to Find Them: FairytaleQA -- An Authentic Dataset for Narrative Comprehensioncited by 79
2 more
  1. 2018CliCR: A Dataset of Clinical Case Reports for Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 34
  2. 2019Multi-Relational Question Answering from Narratives: Machine Reading and Reasoning in Simulated Worldscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024TANQ: An open domain dataset of table answered questions
  2. 2024SceMQA: A Scientific College Entrance Level Multimodal Question Answering Benchmark
  3. 2022Teaching Broad Reasoning Skills for Multi-Step QA by Generating Hard Contexts
  4. 2023ToolQA: A Dataset for LLM Question Answering with External Tools
  5. 2023IfQA: A Dataset for Open-domain Question Answering under Counterfactual Presuppositions
  6. 2025AirQA: A Comprehensive QA Dataset for AI Research with Instance-Level Evaluation
  7. 2026Gurukul AI: An Interactive AI-Driven Educational Platform for Indian Education System
  8. 2026Beyond Factual QA: Mentorship-Oriented Question Answering over Long-Form Multilingual Content