mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Language Models Can Reduce Asymmetry in Information Markets

arXiv 2403.14443 ↗First posted 21 Mar 2024cs.AI cs.CL cs.GTcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This work addresses the buyer's inspection paradox for information markets. The paradox is that buyers need to access information to determine its value, while sellers need to limit access to prevent theft. To study this, we introduce an open-source simulated digital marketplace where intelligent agents, powered by language models, buy and sell information on behalf of external participants. The central mechanism enabling this marketplace is the agents' dual capabilities: they not only have the capacity to assess the quality of privileged information but also come equipped with the ability to forget. This ability to induce amnesia allows vendors to grant temporary access to proprietary information, significantly reducing the risk of unauthorized retention while enabling agents to accurately gauge the information's relevance to specific queries or tasks. To perform well, agents must make rational decisions, strategically explore the marketplace through generated sub-queries, and synthesize answers from purchased information. Concretely, our experiments (a) uncover biases in language models leading to irrational behavior and evaluate techniques to mitigate these biases, (b) investigate how price affects demand in the context of informational goods, and (c) show that inspection and higher budgets both lead to higher quality outcomes.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Mar 2024.

Builds on

11 of 66 references.

References · 11

  1. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  2. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,346
  3. 2021Improving language models by retrieving from trillions of tokenscited by 1,278
  4. 2019Passage Re-ranking with BERTcited by 629
  5. 2022Precise Zero-Shot Dense Retrieval without Relevance Labelscited by 508
  6. 2023Evaluating Correctness and Faithfulness of Instruction-Following Models for Question Answeringcited by 150
  7. 2021End-to-End Training of Multi-Document Reader and Retriever for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 133
  8. 2023Evaluating Open-Domain Question Answering in the Era of Large Language Modelscited by 110
  9. 2020The AI Economist: Improving Equality and Productivity with AI-Driven Tax Policiescited by 75
  10. 2021Baleen: Robust Multi-Hop Reasoning at Scale via Condensed Retrievalcited by 63
  11. 2023Assessing the Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions Using GPT-4 and Rule-Based Methodscited by 23

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

5 papers.