mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LLM-based Extraction of Contradictions from Patents

arXiv 2403.14258 ↗First posted 21 Mar 2024cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Already since the 1950s TRIZ shows that patents and the technical contradictions they solve are an important source of inspiration for the development of innovative products. However, TRIZ is a heuristic based on a historic patent analysis and does not make use of the ever-increasing number of latest technological solutions in current patents. Because of the huge number of patents, their length, and, last but not least, their complexity there is a need for modern patent retrieval and patent analysis to go beyond keyword-oriented methods. Recent advances in patent retrieval and analysis mainly focus on dense vectors based on neural AI Transformer language models like Google BERT. They are, for example, used for dense retrieval, question answering or summarization and key concept extraction. A research focus within the methods for patent summarization and key concept extraction are generic inventive concepts respectively TRIZ concepts like problems, solutions, advantage of invention, parameters, and contradictions. Succeeding rule-based approaches, finetuned BERT-like language models for sentence-wise classification represent the state-of-the-art of inventive concept extraction. While they work comparatively well for basic concepts like problems or solutions, contradictions - as a more complex abstraction - remain a challenge for these models. This paper goes one step further, as it presents a method to extract TRIZ contradictions from patent texts based on Prompt Engineering using a generative Large Language Model (LLM), namely OpenAI's GPT-4. Contradiction detection, sentence extraction, contradiction summarization, parameter extraction and assignment to the 39 abstract TRIZ engineering parameters are all performed in a single prompt using the LangChain framework. Our results show that "off-the-shelf" GPT-4 is a serious alternative to existing approaches.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Mar 2024.

Builds on

10 of 35 references.

References · 10

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  4. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  5. 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agentscited by 1,211
  6. 2021Prompt Programming for Large Language Models: Beyond the Few-Shot Paradigmcited by 599
  7. 2023Large Language Models for Information Retrieval: A Surveycited by 331
  8. 2023Eight Things to Know about Large Language Modelscited by 73
  9. 2019Induction Networks for Few-Shot Text Classificationcited by 64
  10. 2023Evaluating the Deductive Competence of Large Language Modelscited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

3 papers.