Taming Differentiable Logics with Coq Formalisation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
For performance and verification in machine learning, new methods have recently been proposed that optimise learning systems to satisfy formally expressed logical properties. Among these methods, differentiable logics (DLs) are used to translate propositional or first-order formulae into loss functions deployed for optimisation in machine learning. At the same time, recent attempts to give programming language support for verification of neural networks showed that DLs can be used to compile verification properties to machine-learning backends. This situation is calling for stronger guarantees about the soundness of such compilers, the soundness and compositionality of DLs, and the differentiability and performance of the resulting loss functions. In this paper, we propose an approach to formalise existing DLs using the Mathematical Components library in the Coq proof assistant. Thanks to this formalisation, we are able to give uniform semantics to otherwise disparate DLs, give formal proofs to existing informal arguments, find errors in previous work, and provide formal proofs to missing conjectured properties. This work is meant as a stepping stone for the development of programming language support for verification of machine learning.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Mar 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.
3 papers.
- 2025Neural Network Verification is a Programming Language Challengecited by 12
- 2025Proof-Carrying Neuro-Symbolic Codecited by 1
- 2025A General Framework for Property-Driven Machine Learningcited by 1
- 2025A General Framework for Property-Driven Machine Learning1 May 2025
- 2025Proof-Carrying Neuro-Symbolic Code16 Apr 2025
- 2025Neural Network Verification is a Programming Language Challenge10 Jan 2025