mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Third-Party Language Model Performance Prediction from Instruction

arXiv 2403.12413 ↗First posted 19 Mar 2024cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Language model-based instruction-following systems have lately shown increasing performance on many benchmark tasks, demonstrating the capability of adapting to a broad variety of instructions. However, such systems are often not designed to be transparent about their limitations; a user may easily prompt a model with an instruction without any idea of whether the responses should be expected to be accurate, or if the system is even capable of performing the task. We propose a third party performance prediction framework, where a separate model is trained to predict the metric resulting from evaluating an instruction-following system on a task while assuming access only to its inputs and outputs at inference time. We perform this analysis with a variety of both open and closed instruction-following models as well as multiple performance predictors, and examine the effect of various factors such as model size, number of training tasks, and prompt format. Our findings indicate that third-party performance prediction is very challenging, and much work remains in developing predictors that can automatically reveal the limitations of modern instruction-following natural language processing systems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Mar 2024.

Builds on

20 of 28 references.

References · 20

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  4. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
  5. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
  6. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,970
  7. 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,783
  8. 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,371
  9. 2023Just Ask for Calibration: Strategies for Eliciting Calibrated Confidence Scores from Language Models Fine-Tuned with Human Feedbackcited by 788
  10. 2022Teaching Models to Express Their Uncertainty in Wordscited by 731
  11. 2021Cross-Task Generalization via Natural Language Crowdsourcing Instructionscited by 696
  12. 2023How Far Can Camels Go? Exploring the State of Instruction Tuning on Open Resourcescited by 405
8 more
  1. 2022Unnatural Instructions: Tuning Language Models with (Almost) No Human Laborcited by 395
  2. 2021Do Prompt-Based Models Really Understand the Meaning of their Prompts?cited by 324
  3. 2022Prompting GPT-3 To Be Reliablecited by 258
  4. 2021Surface Form Competition: Why the Highest Probability Answer Isn't Always Rightcited by 256
  5. 2020Predicting Performance for Natural Language Processing Taskscited by 49
  6. 2023How Predictable Are Large Language Model Capabilities? A Case Study on BIG-benchcited by 34
  7. 2021Towards More Fine-grained and Reliable NLP Performance Predictioncited by 26
  8. 2023Estimating Large Language Model Capabilities without Labeled Test Datacited by 9

Built on by

Not cited yet.