Zero-Shot Multi-task Hallucination Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In recent studies, the extensive utilization of large language models has underscored the importance of robust evaluation methodologies for assessing text generation quality and relevance to specific tasks. This has revealed a prevalent issue known as hallucination, an emergent condition in the model where generated text lacks faithfulness to the source and deviates from the evaluation criteria. In this study, we formally define hallucination and propose a framework for its quantitative detection in a zero-shot setting, leveraging our definition and the assumption that model outputs entail task and sample specific inputs. In detecting hallucinations, our solution achieves an accuracy of 0.78 in a model-aware setting and 0.61 in a model-agnostic setting. Notably, our solution maintains computational efficiency, requiring far less computational resources than other SOTA approaches, aligning with the trend towards lightweight and compressed models.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 7 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Mar 2024.
Builds on
5 of 7 references.
References · 5
- 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
- 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,181
- 2019Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understandingcited by 807
- 2022Detecting and Mitigating Hallucinations in Machine Translation: Model Internal Workings Alone Do Well, Sentence Similarity Even Bettercited by 75
- 2023Interpretable Word Sense Representations via Definition Generation: The Case of Semantic Change Analysiscited by 19
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.