mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Routing and Scheduling in Answer Set Programming applied to Multi-Agent Path Finding: Preliminary Report

arXiv 2403.12153 ↗First posted 18 Mar 2024cs.AI cs.LO cs.SCcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present alternative approaches to routing and scheduling in Answer Set Programming (ASP), and explore them in the context of Multi-agent Path Finding. The idea is to capture the flow of time in terms of partial orders rather than time steps attached to actions and fluents. This also abolishes the need for fixed upper bounds on the length of plans. The trade-off for this avoidance is that (parts of) temporal trajectories must be acyclic, since multiple occurrences of the same action or fluent cannot be distinguished anymore. While this approach provides an interesting alternative for modeling routing, it is without alternative for scheduling since fine-grained timings cannot be represented in ASP in a feasible way. This is different for partial orders that can be efficiently handled by external means such as acyclicity and difference constraints. We formally elaborate upon this idea and present several resulting ASP encodings. Finally, we demonstrate their effectiveness via an empirical analysis.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Mar 2024.

Builds on

3 of 20 references.

References · 3

  1. 2019Multi-Agent Pathfinding: Definitions, Variants, and Benchmarkscited by 199
  2. 2020A Feedback Scheme to Reorder a Multi-Agent Execution Schedule by Persistently Optimizing a Switchable Action Dependency Graphcited by 6
  3. 2023Coordination of Multiple Robots along Given Paths with Bounded Junction Complexitycited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.