mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Compositional Kronecker Context Optimization for Vision-Language Models

arXiv 2403.11631 ↗First posted 18 Mar 2024cs.CVcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP

Abstract (arXiv)

Context Optimization (CoOp) has emerged as a simple yet effective technique for adapting CLIP-like vision-language models to downstream image recognition tasks. Nevertheless, learning compact context with satisfactory base-to-new, domain and cross-task generalization ability while adapting to new tasks is still a challenge. To tackle such a challenge, we propose a lightweight yet generalizable approach termed Compositional Kronecker Context Optimization (CK-CoOp). Technically, the prompt's context words in CK-CoOp are learnable vectors, which are crafted by linearly combining base vectors sourced from a dictionary. These base vectors consist of a non-learnable component obtained by quantizing the weights in the token embedding layer, and a learnable component constructed by applying Kronecker product on several learnable tiny matrices. Intuitively, the compositional structure mitigates the risk of overfitting on training data by remembering more pre-trained knowledge. Meantime, the Kronecker product breaks the non-learnable restrictions of the dictionary, thereby enhancing representation ability with minimal additional parameters. Extensive experiments confirm that CK-CoOp achieves state-of-the-art performance under base-to-new, domain and cross-task generalization evaluation, but also has the metrics of fewer learnable parameters and efficient training and inference speed.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 39 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Mar 2024.

Builds on

39 of 58 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2022Understanding and Mitigating Overfitting in Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models4 Nov
  2. 2022Prompt Tuning with Soft Context Sharing for Vision-Language Models29 Aug
  3. 2022Prompt-aligned Gradient for Prompt Tuning30 May
  4. 2022Prompt Distribution Learning6 May
  5. 2022Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Models10 Mar
  6. 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Models2 Sep

Other references · 33

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  4. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
  5. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
  6. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
  7. 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,222
  8. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
  9. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
  10. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,701
  11. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
  12. 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,488
21 more
  1. 2020Making Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot Learnerscited by 1,255
  2. 2016Pruning Filters for Efficient ConvNetscited by 1,129
  3. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,010
  4. 2021Florence: A New Foundation Model for Computer Visioncited by 802
  5. 2021FILIP: Fine-grained Interactive Language-Image Pre-Trainingcited by 626
  6. 2021DenseCLIP: Language-Guided Dense Prediction with Context-Aware Promptingcited by 530
  7. 2021CRIS: CLIP-Driven Referring Image Segmentationcited by 353
  8. 2021Factual Probing Is [MASK]: Learning vs. Learning to Recallcited by 291
  9. 2020AutoPrompt: Eliciting Knowledge from Language Models with Automatically Generated Promptscited by 246
  10. 2022Unified Contrastive Learning in Image-Text-Label Spacecited by 194
  11. 2022Neural Prompt Searchcited by 133
  12. 2015Accelerating Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Classification and Detectioncited by 109
  13. 2022DualCoOp: Fast Adaptation to Multi-Label Recognition with Limited Annotationscited by 102
  14. 2017CirCNN: Accelerating and Compressing Deep Neural Networks Using Block-CirculantWeight Matricescited by 53
  15. 2021Towards Efficient Tensor Decomposition-Based DNN Model Compression with Optimization Frameworkcited by 52
  16. 2022VL-BEiT: Generative Vision-Language Pretrainingcited by 39
  17. 2022Write and Paint: Generative Vision-Language Models are Unified Modal Learnerscited by 17
  18. 2019CircConv: A Structured Convolution with Low Complexitycited by 8
  19. 2014Circulant Binary Embeddingcited by 6
  20. 2022Self-Training Vision Language BERTs with a Unified Conditional Modelcited by 6
  21. 2022Structured Prompt Tuningcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Low-Rank Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Models with Fixed-Token Bases
  2. 2024In-Context Learning Improves Compositional Understanding of Vision-Language Models
  3. 2023ECO: Ensembling Context Optimization for Vision-Language Models
  4. 2024Optimization of Prompt Learning via Multi-Knowledge Representation for Vision-Language Models
  5. 2025GLAD: Generalizable Tuning for Vision-Language Models
  6. 2026Domain-Invariant Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Models
  7. 2021CLIP-Adapter: Better Vision-Language Models with Feature Adapters
  8. 2023Linear Spaces of Meanings: Compositional Structures in Vision-Language Models