mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Can a GPT4-Powered AI Agent Be a Good Enough Performance Attribution Analyst?

arXiv 2403.10482 ↗First posted 15 Mar 2024q-fin.CP cs.AI q-fin.PMcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Financial trading and forecasting agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Performance attribution analysis, defined as the process of explaining the drivers of the excess performance of an investment portfolio against a benchmark, stands as a significant feature of portfolio management and plays a crucial role in the investment decision-making process, particularly within the fund management industry. Rooted in a solid financial and mathematical framework, the importance and methodologies of this analytical technique are extensively documented across numerous academic research papers and books. The integration of large language models (LLMs) and AI agents marks a groundbreaking development in this field. These agents are designed to automate and enhance the performance attribution analysis by accurately calculating and analyzing portfolio performances against benchmarks. In this study, we introduce the application of an AI Agent for a variety of essential performance attribution tasks, including the analysis of performance drivers and utilizing LLMs as calculation engine for multi-level attribution analysis and question-answering (QA) tasks. Leveraging advanced prompt engineering techniques such as Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and Plan and Solve (PS), and employing a standard agent framework from LangChain, the research achieves promising results: it achieves accuracy rates exceeding 93% in analyzing performance drivers, attains 100% in multi-level attribution calculations, and surpasses 84% accuracy in QA exercises that simulate official examination standards. These findings affirm the impactful role of AI agents, prompt engineering and evaluation in advancing portfolio management processes, highlighting a significant development in the practical application and evaluation of Generative AI technologies within the domain.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Financial trading and forecasting agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 3 of its 6 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Mar 2024.

Builds on

3 of 6 references.

References · 3

  1. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  2. 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,422
  3. 2023Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIscited by 1,302

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Hedge-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks Pertaining to Financial Reasoning
  2. 2026Toward Expert Investment Teams:A Multi-Agent LLM System with Fine-Grained Trading Tasks
  3. 2026From Knowing to Doing: A Memory-Controlled Benchmark for LLM Trading Agents on Stock Markets
  4. 2026Designing Agentic AI-Based Screening for Portfolio Investment
  5. 2024FinRobot: An Open-Source AI Agent Platform for Financial Applications using Large Language Models
  6. 2026Evaluating Financial Intelligence in Large Language Models: Benchmarking SuperInvesting AI with LLM Engines
  7. 2026OpenFinGym: A Verifiable Multi-Task Gym Environment for Evaluating Quant Agents
  8. 2025Benchmarking LLM Agents for Wealth-Management Workflows