Cross-Modal Learning of Housing Quality in Amsterdam
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In our research we test data and models for the recognition of housing quality in the city of Amsterdam from ground-level and aerial imagery. For ground-level images we compare Google StreetView (GSV) to Flickr images. Our results show that GSV predicts the most accurate building quality scores, approximately 30% better than using only aerial images. However, we find that through careful filtering and by using the right pre-trained model, Flickr image features combined with aerial image features are able to halve the performance gap to GSV features from 30% to 15%. Our results indicate that there are viable alternatives to GSV for liveability factor prediction, which is encouraging as GSV images are more difficult to acquire and not always available.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Mar 2024.
Builds on
3 of 15 references.
References · 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.