When Code Smells Meet ML: On the Lifecycle of ML-specific Code Smells in ML-enabled Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Context. The adoption of Machine Learning (ML)--enabled systems is steadily increasing. Nevertheless, there is a shortage of ML-specific quality assurance approaches, possibly because of the limited knowledge of how quality-related concerns emerge and evolve in ML-enabled systems. Objective. We aim to investigate the emergence and evolution of specific types of quality-related concerns known as ML-specific code smells, i.e., sub-optimal implementation solutions applied on ML pipelines that may significantly decrease both the quality and maintainability of ML-enabled systems. More specifically, we present a plan to study ML-specific code smells by empirically analyzing (i) their prevalence in real ML-enabled systems, (ii) how they are introduced and removed, and (iii) their survivability. Method. We will conduct an exploratory study, mining a large dataset of ML-enabled systems and analyzing over 400k commits about 337 projects. We will track and inspect the introduction and evolution of ML smells through CodeSmile, a novel ML smell detector that we will build to enable our investigation and to detect ML-specific code smells.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Mar 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.