mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Analyzing Adversarial Attacks on Sequence-to-Sequence Relevance Models

arXiv 2403.07654 ↗First posted 12 Mar 2024cs.IRcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Modern sequence-to-sequence relevance models like monoT5 can effectively capture complex textual interactions between queries and documents through cross-encoding. However, the use of natural language tokens in prompts, such as Query, Document, and Relevant for monoT5, opens an attack vector for malicious documents to manipulate their relevance score through prompt injection, e.g., by adding target words such as true. Since such possibilities have not yet been considered in retrieval evaluation, we analyze the impact of query-independent prompt injection via manually constructed templates and LLM-based rewriting of documents on several existing relevance models. Our experiments on the TREC Deep Learning track show that adversarial documents can easily manipulate different sequence-to-sequence relevance models, while BM25 (as a typical lexical model) is not affected. Remarkably, the attacks also affect encoder-only relevance models (which do not rely on natural language prompt tokens), albeit to a lesser extent.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Mar 2024.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

3 papers.